2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of smoking on hearing loss: quality assessment and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

11
85
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
11
85
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A meta analysis study which was conducted in Japan also came with similar conclusions. This study had 15 observational studies, out of which the quality scores of 9 studies showed positive associations between smoking and hearing loss [23]. In contrast to the findings of this study, no correlation was found between hearing loss and smoking in the Framingham [24] and Baltimore studies [25].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A meta analysis study which was conducted in Japan also came with similar conclusions. This study had 15 observational studies, out of which the quality scores of 9 studies showed positive associations between smoking and hearing loss [23]. In contrast to the findings of this study, no correlation was found between hearing loss and smoking in the Framingham [24] and Baltimore studies [25].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The Framingham 33 and Baltimore studies 34 didn't find any connection between hearing loss and smoking. Smoking may accelerate the age related hearing loss (presbycusis), as was demonstrated in various studies [7,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These criteria have been used in meta-analyses 78,79 and systematic reviews 80,81 and provide an adequate instrument for use in systematic reviews like ours 82 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further investigations on this issue are in need. Meanwhile, smoking habit has been characterized as an independent risk factor of hearing loss 3,11,13,22) , and does-response relation was found 7) . In current study, although not significant, the adjusted relative risk of NIHL for frequent smokers comparing to non-smokers was more than three folds, which should be noticeable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%