1973
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.2.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of skin wetting on finger cooling and freezing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal danger and threat to tolerance during cold air exposure is an increased risk of peripheral cold injury, primarily frostbite. The skin surface freezes between −3.7 and −4.8 • C (58,165,262), due to the electrolyte content of cells and fluids, although wet skin freezes at a higher threshold…”
Section: Cold Air Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal danger and threat to tolerance during cold air exposure is an increased risk of peripheral cold injury, primarily frostbite. The skin surface freezes between −3.7 and −4.8 • C (58,165,262), due to the electrolyte content of cells and fluids, although wet skin freezes at a higher threshold…”
Section: Cold Air Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to an effect on skin temperature, emollients may have other effects on skin increasing its risk of cold injury, such as moisturizing of the skin surface. The freezing temperature of the stratum corneum has been shown to rise with increased water content, both in vitro (14) and in vivo (15). This phenomenon could not be tested in this study, as the cold exposure did not lead to actual frostbite.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The risk of FCI increases with lower tissue temperatures and the probability of FCI is about 95% at a tissue temperature of −4.4°C [ 30 ]. The rate and duration of the cooling process in the human tissue might alter due to skin-moisture [ 31 , 32 ], peripheral vasoconstriction, contact with supercooled liquids (f.i. petrol) [ 5 ] conductive heat-loss (f.i.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%