1976
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0480223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of site of transfer on pregnancy and twinning rates following bilateral egg transfer in the cow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported elsewhere that the greatest embryonic loss occurs soon after transfer [33,34], and that a large percentage of embryos classified as excellent or good do not survive [35]. In this study, the greatest loss (57%) occurred by day 30 after estrus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…It has been reported elsewhere that the greatest embryonic loss occurs soon after transfer [33,34], and that a large percentage of embryos classified as excellent or good do not survive [35]. In this study, the greatest loss (57%) occurred by day 30 after estrus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…A random sample of those diagnosed as pregnant was then slaughtered from each of the ipsilateral (N = 20) and contralateral ( = 20) transfer groups at Day 53 of gestation to provide a measure of embryo survival rate up to the time of completion of implantation. Confirmation of a viable pregnancy and embryo survival at this time was based on the expected weight for age of each fetus, its fetal fluids and membranes (Sreenan & Beehan, 1976). The remaining heifers diagnosed as pregnant (N = 53) were held to full term but were pregnancy tested by palpation again on Day 150 from insemination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-surgically transferred embryos were seldom placed further into the uterine horn than the intercornual ligament whereas surgically transferred embryos were placed near to the tip of the uterus. From the work of Sreenan & Beehan (1976) and Newcomb et al (1977) site of transfer does not appear to be important. It may be concluded therefore that the transfer method itself is in some way responsible for the poor fetal survival rate after non-surgical transfer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%