1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2738(98)00517-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of SiO2 morphology and pores size on the proton nanocomposite electrolytes properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
68
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, a single conductivity maximum has been reported in the literature for most of the Li þ , Ag þ , Na þ ion conducting composites with Al 2 O 3 as the dispersoid in contrast to the present proton conducting composites studied by us using hydrates and alumina which exhibit two conductivity maxima. From a careful scan of literature data, we could find some systems which also exhibit two peaks in the conductivity-composition isotherm [29][30][31][32] but due notice was either not taken or no effort was made to explain them. We propose the following two tentative models to find a qualitative explanation for the occurrence of two maxima in the conductivity-composition isotherm: Our present data cannot unequivocably establish either of the above two models.…”
Section: Total Ionic Transference Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, a single conductivity maximum has been reported in the literature for most of the Li þ , Ag þ , Na þ ion conducting composites with Al 2 O 3 as the dispersoid in contrast to the present proton conducting composites studied by us using hydrates and alumina which exhibit two conductivity maxima. From a careful scan of literature data, we could find some systems which also exhibit two peaks in the conductivity-composition isotherm [29][30][31][32] but due notice was either not taken or no effort was made to explain them. We propose the following two tentative models to find a qualitative explanation for the occurrence of two maxima in the conductivity-composition isotherm: Our present data cannot unequivocably establish either of the above two models.…”
Section: Total Ionic Transference Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Park et al [6,15] suggested that mechanisms of the electrical conductivity in H-bonded crystals must consider thermal dehydration, as well as ionic transport, because it is known that many H-bonded crystals reveal surface instabilities like thermal dehydration at high temperatures. Given that structural disorder facilitates ionic conduction, we studied the high-temperature phenomena and the dynamics of mobile protons in ADP-based composites since proton transport may be affected by the presence of outer and inner surfaces provided by highly dispersed ceramic nanoparticles, such as TiO 2 in the ADP solid matrix [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the low-temperature phase, the composites with SiO 2 and TiO 2 showed 2-3 orders of magnitude higher conductivity than that of pure cesium hydrogen sulphate, while proton conductivity in the superprotonic phase decreases by mixing inorganic particles [77,78].…”
Section: Inorganic Proton Conductorsmentioning
confidence: 97%