2013
DOI: 10.5480/1536-5026-34.3.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Simulation on the Development of Critical Thinking in Associate Degree Nursing Students

Abstract: Results suggest that high- and low-fidelity simulations are both associated with increases in critical thinking scores.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…During this process, the student resorted to critical thinking and developed the clinical judgment, considering , that the simulation required the implementation of the care process. This result is consistent with that of other investigations that show that the SHFP allows to develop the critical thinking [18][19] and clinical judgment [20][21] . It also enables the effective development of transferable and transformational leadership skills and thus improves critical thinking and clinical thinking of students in more complex care situations 18 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During this process, the student resorted to critical thinking and developed the clinical judgment, considering , that the simulation required the implementation of the care process. This result is consistent with that of other investigations that show that the SHFP allows to develop the critical thinking [18][19] and clinical judgment [20][21] . It also enables the effective development of transferable and transformational leadership skills and thus improves critical thinking and clinical thinking of students in more complex care situations 18 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This category includes manipulation, articulation and naturalization 17 . The clinical scenario was perceived as a moment that allows the development of communication skills, especially with the patient 15 , and can become an equally useful methodology in the development of communication skills in the multidisciplinary team [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . The students showed difficulties in recognizing the client's problems and in the systematized communication of these data to other professionals, mainly by telephone, which reinforces the need for training and the evaluation of the levels of proficiency in this field 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case study yang menyediakan kesempatan untuk berdiskusi mengenai kasus-kasus dari situasi klinik merupakan strategi yang dianggap dapat melatih kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa keperawatan (Goodstone & Goodstone, 2013). Popil (2011) menjelaskan bahwa case study efektif dalam memfasilitasi pembelajaran aktif, pemecahan masalah, dan mengembangkan berpikir kritis.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Namun tidak ada perbedaan skor kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa antara kelompok intervensi dan kontrol (p=0.146), ini berarti bahwa case study cukup dapat memicu mahasiswa untuk dapat berpikir kritis sama halnya dengan SPE. Hasil ini sejalan dengan penelitian kuasi-eksperimen oleh Goodstone et al (2013) yang juga membandingkan kemampuan ber pi k ir 27 mahasiswa keperawatan yang mendapat pembelajaran model high-fidelity simulation dibandingkan dengan case study. Hasil penelitiannya menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan model simulasi dapat meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa keperawatan namun tidak memiliki perbedaan yang signifikan jika dibandingkan dengan case study (Goodstone & Goodstone, 2013).…”
Section: Pembahasan Efektivitas Model Standardized Patient Experienceunclassified
“…Properly conducted, HFSB creates an ideal educational environment because learning activities can be made to be predictable, consistent, standardized, safe, and reproducible. This encourages learning through experimentation and trial-and-error with the ability to rewind, rehearse, and practice without negative patient outcomes (Okuda et al, 2009), as it provides a safe place for students to practice before entering the clinical setting (Goodstone et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%