2016
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.15.0693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Simulated Heat Stress on Digestibility, Methane Emission and Metabolic Adaptability in Crossbred Cattle

Abstract: The present experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of simulated heat stress on digestibility and methane (CH4) emission. Four non-lactating crossbred cattle were exposed to 25°C, 30°C, 35°C, and 40°C temperature with a relative humidity of 40% to 50% in a climatic chamber from 10:00 hours to 15:00 hours every day for 27 days. The physiological responses were recorded at 15:00 hours every day. The blood samples were collected at 15:00 hours on 1st, 6th, 11th, 16th, and 21st days and serum was collected… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Steers in phase 3 had higher apparent digestibility of DM, OM, CP, and EE, which is similar to the reports of Yadav et al [11], and these differences could be due to longer retention time of digesta in phase 3 because previous study revealed digesta retention time increased as ambient temperature increased when temperature was below 35 • C [11]. However, this effect was quite different in the apparent digestibility of NDF and ADF.…”
Section: Digestive and Physiological Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Steers in phase 3 had higher apparent digestibility of DM, OM, CP, and EE, which is similar to the reports of Yadav et al [11], and these differences could be due to longer retention time of digesta in phase 3 because previous study revealed digesta retention time increased as ambient temperature increased when temperature was below 35 • C [11]. However, this effect was quite different in the apparent digestibility of NDF and ADF.…”
Section: Digestive and Physiological Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Previous report revealed that both Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-002 and Ruminobacter abundances in rumen were positively associated with ambient temperature [8]. Yadav et al [11] found that low ambient temperature reduced the mean retention time of ruminal contents, thus low digestibility of digesta may appear. Niu et al [12] observed strong correlations between certain genera and apparent digestibility of fiber.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Heat stress in domestic cattle is induced when exposure to temperatures surpass 35°C [ 54 ]; observations of raw maximal temperatures in MFR regularly surpassed 35°C, reaching an upper limit of 44°C. Such high temperatures influence metabolic processes and physio-biochemical processes, increasing methane emissions and water intake, and decreasing urination, lactation and body weight, among others [ 49 , 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heat stress in domestic cattle is induced when exposure to temperatures surpass 35°C [ 54 ]; observations of raw maximal temperatures in MFR regularly surpassed 35°C, reaching an upper limit of 44°C. Such high temperatures influence metabolic processes and physio-biochemical processes, increasing methane emissions and water intake, and decreasing urination, lactation and body weight, among others [ 49 , 54 , 55 ]. Black coloured cattle like Bornean banteng bulls are more susceptible to heat, as they absorb more solar radiation and require more frequent use of shade but also exhibit higher rates of heat loss than white and piebald colour cattle [ 48 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PRMT5 has been reported as a type II arginine methyltransferase and could silence gene expression by symmetrical di-methylation of H4R3, H2R3, and H3R8 (2527). Additionally, PRMT5 could modulate the methylation of H4S1ph, H4K20me3, H3K9me3, and H3K27me3 (28). DNMT1 serve as the key modulators that control the transcriptional accessibility to the Foxp3 regulatory regions (24, 29).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%