2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of silica particle size on chain dynamics and frictional properties of styrene butadiene rubber nano and micro composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This experimental study illustrates some general problems encountered with experimental validation of homogenization models, namely, incomplete set of constituent properties and the important role of interfacial phenomena at matrix/filler interfaces that affect effective stiffness both through incomplete bonding and also through alternations in the composite microstructure. For viscoelastic composites with nanosized inclusions, the inclusion surface area per unit volume increases greatly and the interfacial effects become prominent so for reliable predictions, one should necessarily explicitly account for the presence of the interfacial layers (see, e.g., Shashidhar and Shenoy, 2001;Berriot et al, 2002, 20 03;Heinrich and Klüppel, 20 02;Gauthier, 20 04;Ozmusul et al, 2005;Goertzen and Kessler, 2008;Fritzsche and Klüppel, 2011;Litvinov et al, 2011;Stockelhuber et al, 2011;Pourhossaini and Razzagni-Kashani, 2014;Underwood and Kim, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experimental study illustrates some general problems encountered with experimental validation of homogenization models, namely, incomplete set of constituent properties and the important role of interfacial phenomena at matrix/filler interfaces that affect effective stiffness both through incomplete bonding and also through alternations in the composite microstructure. For viscoelastic composites with nanosized inclusions, the inclusion surface area per unit volume increases greatly and the interfacial effects become prominent so for reliable predictions, one should necessarily explicitly account for the presence of the interfacial layers (see, e.g., Shashidhar and Shenoy, 2001;Berriot et al, 2002, 20 03;Heinrich and Klüppel, 20 02;Gauthier, 20 04;Ozmusul et al, 2005;Goertzen and Kessler, 2008;Fritzsche and Klüppel, 2011;Litvinov et al, 2011;Stockelhuber et al, 2011;Pourhossaini and Razzagni-Kashani, 2014;Underwood and Kim, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the researchers have related the substantial improvement of mechanical properties in the polymer nanocomposites to formation of a strong interphase between polymer and nanoparticles [16][17][18][19]. The influence of interface/interphase properties on the final performance of nanocomposites has paid much attention in the recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, nanocomposites show higher activation 9 Activation energy of chain mobilization versus titania volume percentage energy than micro-composites at the same filler volume percentage. This higher activation energy and its faster rate of increase with filler content for nanocomposites compared to micro-composites reveals the slower dynamics of EPR chains around the nano-particles regardless of the higher surface area of nano-titania [33]. As a result, the intensity of immobilization of one mole of rubber chains around nano-titania is higher than that for micro-titania.…”
Section: Dynamic Mechanical Behavior Of Compositesmentioning
confidence: 93%