2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Si doping on structure, thermal expansion and magnetism of antiperovskite manganese nitrides Mn3Cu1−xSixN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After averaging the volumes of all the configurations, we find the volume of PM state is close to that of the configuration with lowest energy, implying that at magnetic transition, the volume contraction will disappear. This result agrees with the experiment, in which the NTE could not occur in Mn 3 (Cu 0.5 Si 0.5 )N. 35 From the results above, we find the configuration Γ 5g is very necessary to the NTE, and for the compounds with dopant from Si to Sn, this configuration becomes more stable. Meanwhile, the energy distribution of all the configurations considered becomes wider, implying the energy difference between the PM state and the lowest energy state increases from Mn 3 (Cu 0.5 Si 0.5 )N to Mn 3 (Cu 0.5 Sn 0.5 )N and so the transition temperature increases, too.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…After averaging the volumes of all the configurations, we find the volume of PM state is close to that of the configuration with lowest energy, implying that at magnetic transition, the volume contraction will disappear. This result agrees with the experiment, in which the NTE could not occur in Mn 3 (Cu 0.5 Si 0.5 )N. 35 From the results above, we find the configuration Γ 5g is very necessary to the NTE, and for the compounds with dopant from Si to Sn, this configuration becomes more stable. Meanwhile, the energy distribution of all the configurations considered becomes wider, implying the energy difference between the PM state and the lowest energy state increases from Mn 3 (Cu 0.5 Si 0.5 )N to Mn 3 (Cu 0.5 Sn 0.5 )N and so the transition temperature increases, too.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For one thing, depending on the empirical knowledge, the T N in Mn 3 XN is determined by the number of valence electrons on X, n v [19]. As known, Cu has one valence electrons (n v ¼ 1) while Ni has two (n v ¼ 2), when Ni is replaced by Cu, the electron concentration of Mn 3d -N 2p covalent bond should have been weakened, and then, the T N temperature has to be decreased [19]. For another, the tendency of magnetic transition depending on Cu content is associated with the exchange interactions between the nearestneighbor MneMn moments as well.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2005, Takenaka firstly reported the broadening of MVE window in Cu 1− x Ge x NMn 3 (Takenaka and Takagi, 2005). From then on, many studies reported the NTE properties in ANMn 3 (A = Zn, Ga, Ag, and Cu) by substituting A with non-magnetic elements, such as Ge, Sn, Si (Sun et al, 2007, 2010a,b; Huang et al, 2008; Takenaka et al, 2008; Dai et al, 2014). Neutron diffraction studies indicated that the pronounced MVE occurs due to the ordering of the non-collinear triangular Γ 5g AFM spin configuration, and the non-magnetic element doping slows down the ordering of Γ 5g AFM phase (Iikubo et al, 2008a; Song et al, 2011; Deng et al, 2015a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%