2020
DOI: 10.1590/1984-70332020v20n2a31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of selection response for yield related traits in early and later generations of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that mean squares from genotype and environment obtained for pod yield per plant and other studied component traits were significant, except for kernel length/width ratio, indicating significant variation present among the genotypes under study, which offers great scope for improvement of traits through breeding line selection. Similar results have also been reported by earlier workers as well [ 30 33 ], for pod yield and its related characters. G×E interactions were significant for pod yield, days to flower bud initiation, days to 50% flowering, hundred pod weight, and kernel weight ( Table 3 ), suggesting that genotypes respond differently from season to season, which is in agreement with the results of earlier studies [ 34 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The combined analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that mean squares from genotype and environment obtained for pod yield per plant and other studied component traits were significant, except for kernel length/width ratio, indicating significant variation present among the genotypes under study, which offers great scope for improvement of traits through breeding line selection. Similar results have also been reported by earlier workers as well [ 30 33 ], for pod yield and its related characters. G×E interactions were significant for pod yield, days to flower bud initiation, days to 50% flowering, hundred pod weight, and kernel weight ( Table 3 ), suggesting that genotypes respond differently from season to season, which is in agreement with the results of earlier studies [ 34 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Variations in reciprocal crosses imply maternal influence on biomass, grain yield, and harvest index (Kivrak et al, 2020). Maternal influence has also been reported in the yield and harvest index in sorghum (Mengistu et al, 2020;Shinda et al, 2021), and in legumes (Ofori & Padi, 2020;Kamdar et al, 2020). Thus, to improve yield in chickpea using hybridization choice of parents is critical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between crosses and their reciprocal for yield improvement have been reported (Yasar et al, 2014) in chickpeas. Other reports are in groundnuts, sorghum, pearl millet (Kamdar et al, 2020;Daudi et al, 2021;Shinda et al, 2021;Patil et al, 2021b). This indicates the existence of maternal influence in C. arietinum hybrids.…”
Section: Correlation Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The combined analysis of variance (ANOVA) given in Supplimentary Table S5 showed that mean squares from genotype and environment obtained for pod yield per plant and other studied component traits were significant, indicating significant variation among genotypes under study, offering great scope for improvement of traits through breeding line selection (Ajay et al 2020;Kamdar et al 2020;Singh et al 2015). GEI were significant for pod yield, hundred pod weight, and kernel weight (Supplementary Table S5), suggesting that genotypes respond differently from season to season, which is in agreement with the results of earlier studies (Akbar et al 2017;Rani et al 2023).…”
Section: Yield Evaluation Of Fresh Dormant Spanish Bunch Advanced Bre...mentioning
confidence: 99%