2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2005.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of sediment type on microphytobenthos vertical distribution: Modelling the productive biomass and improving ground truth measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
57
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The median diameter remained the primary factor explaining MPB aggregation, but chl a content showed a significant positive correlation with percentage water content, which did not occur when examining chl a concen- , as clearly demonstrated by Perkins et al (2003). We are aware that chl a concentration is theoretically the best proxy for MPB biomass (Perkins et al 2003, Jesus et al 2006, since chl a concentration is less subject to sediment compaction of mud particles, but we obtained better results with chl a content and a lower degree of error in terms of nugget effect, cross validation and mapped errors (data not shown). A significant part of the explained variability is also lost in the spatial regression analysis when considering chl a concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The median diameter remained the primary factor explaining MPB aggregation, but chl a content showed a significant positive correlation with percentage water content, which did not occur when examining chl a concen- , as clearly demonstrated by Perkins et al (2003). We are aware that chl a concentration is theoretically the best proxy for MPB biomass (Perkins et al 2003, Jesus et al 2006, since chl a concentration is less subject to sediment compaction of mud particles, but we obtained better results with chl a content and a lower degree of error in terms of nugget effect, cross validation and mapped errors (data not shown). A significant part of the explained variability is also lost in the spatial regression analysis when considering chl a concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Surface mud to a depth of ~1 cm was collected on 1 July 2008 from the Alcochete mudflat, located on the eastern shore of the Tagus Estuary, Portugal (38°44' N, 9°08' W), composed of slightly gravelly mud (Jesus et al 2006c). All experimental measurements were carried out on the following day, 2 July 2008.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of high values of skewness and average grain size produce larger interstitial spaces, greater water infiltration and penetration of sunlight below the top millimeters of sediment (JESUS et al, 2006). Nauplius was the most abundant group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High chlorophyll a concentrations below the top layers of the sediment may somehow support microscopic chains and enable the proliferation of meiofauna and Nematoda in reflective beaches (JESUS et al, 2006). The combination of high values of skewness and average grain size produce larger interstitial spaces, greater water infiltration and penetration of sunlight below the top millimeters of sediment (JESUS et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%