1972
DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197209000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Secretin on Circulating Gastrin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
1
3

Year Published

1974
1974
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
20
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…DU patients, on the other hand, failed to exhibit such a response to the secretin challenge. In fact, these patients responded to secretin with a progressive decrease in serum gastrin in keeping with previous observations (8,14,24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…DU patients, on the other hand, failed to exhibit such a response to the secretin challenge. In fact, these patients responded to secretin with a progressive decrease in serum gastrin in keeping with previous observations (8,14,24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The reason for the marked increase in serum gastrin after a test meal in some ZE patients is not clear. Several mechanisms may be put forward to account for the pronounced meal stimulated increase in serum gastrin in these patients, as direct interaction between food and a tumour originated in the duodenal wall, the release of a gastrin stimulating agent-for example, secretin-from the small intestine and co-existing antral G-cell hyperplasia and pancreatic tumours (Polak et al, 1972 (Korman et al, 1973b;Lamers et al, 1977), excluded gastric antrum (Korman et al, 1972b), non-tumorous hypergastrinaemic hyperchlorhydria (Straus and Yalow, 1975), and postprandial conditions (Thompson et al, 1972b). In patients with achlorhydria and excluded gastric antrum, marked increases in serum gastrin after calcium infusion have been found (Straus and Yalow, 1975;Lamers and van Tongeren 1976).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of these tests has been studied in small series (Berson and Yalow, 1972;Isenberg et al, 1972;Thompson et al, 1972b;Becker et al, 1973;Bradley et al, 1973;Korman et al, 1973a, b;Bonfils et al, 1974) and, recently, in relatively larger groups of ZE patients (Creutzfeldt et al, 1975;Thompson et al, 1975). However, comparison of the value of different provocation tests in the same patient has not been recorded previously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical differences (p < 0.05) were determined by the Stu dent's t test for paired data. Integrated values were cal culated as described previously [8].…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%