2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of salinity, Mg2+ and SO42− on “smart water”-induced carbonate wettability alteration in a model oil system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative zeta potential in 0.164 M NaCl is a result of (1) the presence of impurities on the limestone surface and (2) the reduction of cation adsorption compared to high-salinity brines 15 . If the NaCl concentration increases, the Indiana limestone surface will be less negatively charged due to the electrical double layer compression and may become positively charged due to cation (mostly Na + ) surface binding 15,22 . The Indiana limestone zeta potential is −6.9 ± 2.4 mV in 0.4 M NaCl in a closed system.…”
Section: Correlation Between Wettability Alteration and Rock/oil Elecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative zeta potential in 0.164 M NaCl is a result of (1) the presence of impurities on the limestone surface and (2) the reduction of cation adsorption compared to high-salinity brines 15 . If the NaCl concentration increases, the Indiana limestone surface will be less negatively charged due to the electrical double layer compression and may become positively charged due to cation (mostly Na + ) surface binding 15,22 . The Indiana limestone zeta potential is −6.9 ± 2.4 mV in 0.4 M NaCl in a closed system.…”
Section: Correlation Between Wettability Alteration and Rock/oil Elecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms to explain this behavior generally fall within two distinct concepts: the double layer expansion (DLE) model 13,14 posits the presence of an aqueous wetting layer between the carbonate and petroleum phases, whose thickness is controlled by changes in the diffuse layer screening in low ionic strength brines. This concept implicitly assumes that the carbonate surface has a pH-dependent surface charge (e.g., due to protonation reactions of the surface functional groups), which is screened by counter ions, either adsorbed on the surface or distributed in a diffuse ion layer (with a screening length that is controlled by the ionic strength of a solution) [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] . This picture is well-established for oxide-water interfaces, such as the rutile (TiO 2 ) (110) surface 22-24 . In contrast, molecular scale measurements of the well-defined calcite (CaCO 3 ) (104) cleavage surface have found that its speciation does not follow this prediction 25 , and separate measurements of ion adsorption suggest that the net charge of a calcite surface is quite small 26 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZP of rock-brine and oil-brine systems are widely used as a reference to quantify specific surface-to-ion interactions. For example, the results from Al-Mahrouqi et al [28] and Song et al [23] suggest that the assumptions made by Austad and collaborators regarding specific ion interactions (SO 4 2− and Na + ) can be confirmed using ZP data. Empirical models, for instance, the Bond-Product-Sum (BPS), had relative success in quantifying the wettability alteration trends and their relation to ZP values for limestone [29].…”
Section: Experimental Observations and Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The authors concluded that increasing sulfate and decreasing sodium concentration might be beneficial for altering wettability towards a water-wet condition in chalks. Those results motivated researchers to investigate the impact of potential determining ions concentration in oil recovery from carbonate [21][22][23].…”
Section: Experimental Observations and Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%