2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2021.104051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of salinity and temperature on the determination of dissolved iron-binding organic ligands in the polar marine environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elevated concentrations of Lt are observed when SA and NN are used, whereas increased Log K FeL values were recorded for studies using TAC (Figure 6D, irrespective of high values recorded during the ENRICH survey). Such observations have also been made in the Arctic (Ardiningsih et al, 2021b) and conditional stability constants have been noted to only provide a rough estimate of binding strength (Gerringa et al, 2021) which varies with salinity, temperature, and pH, depending on the selected method (Genovese et al, 2022). Therefore, understanding whether trends between Fe-binding ligands and environmental variables are linked to true seasonal supply mechanisms or analytical variability will be crucial to complexation studies going forward.…”
Section: The Mertz Region and Southern Ocean Ligand Collectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Elevated concentrations of Lt are observed when SA and NN are used, whereas increased Log K FeL values were recorded for studies using TAC (Figure 6D, irrespective of high values recorded during the ENRICH survey). Such observations have also been made in the Arctic (Ardiningsih et al, 2021b) and conditional stability constants have been noted to only provide a rough estimate of binding strength (Gerringa et al, 2021) which varies with salinity, temperature, and pH, depending on the selected method (Genovese et al, 2022). Therefore, understanding whether trends between Fe-binding ligands and environmental variables are linked to true seasonal supply mechanisms or analytical variability will be crucial to complexation studies going forward.…”
Section: The Mertz Region and Southern Ocean Ligand Collectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is also important to note that the metal speciation we measure in the laboratory at room temperature and with buffered pH may not best represent in situ speciation. For example, sea ice and brine samples come from a wide range of temperature and salinity conditions, and speciation measurements made under typical conditions can be different from those in the natural environment (Hassler et al, 2013;Genovese et al, 2022). Microscale processes that are not reflected by bulk phycosphere (the micrometer scale region immediately surrounding a phytoplankton cell), such as pH and oxygen concentrations, can also be very different from bulk seawater on which we perform our analyses, resulting in different organic and inorganic speciation (Liu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Moving Forward: Understanding Bioavailabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this September samples, we detected a strong ligand concentration of 4.6 nM and a strong binding capacity, logK cond CuL,Cu 2+ , of 15.0, supporting current understanding of SoG estuarine circulation, where offshore NE Pacific water between 100 and 200 m travels into the SoG's intermediate water year-round through Juan de Fuca and Haro Strait. While variations in salinity and equilibration times can impact comparisons between trace metal speciation studies (Buck and Bruland, 2005;Genovese et al, 2022), deep SoG waters and P4 have comparable salinities (ie., 31.8-34.5 psu for P4 and 30.4 in 100 m Sept) and equilibration times (i.e., > 8 hours for P4 and >12 hours for 100 m Sept).…”
Section: Analytical Window Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%