1998
DOI: 10.2307/3802021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Restrictive Harvest Regulations on Survival and Recovery Rates of American Black Ducks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tive exclusion of American Black Duck pairs from fertile wetlands (Merendino and Ankney 1994) have been suggested. Conversely, other studies have refuted earlier assumptions and provided contradictory evidence for each scenario (e.g., Conroy et al 1989, D'Eon et al 1994, Francis et al 1998, Hoysak and Ankney 1996, Petrie et al 2000, Seymour 1992). Much of the interest stemmed from the potential loss of American Black Ducks as a distinct species if the population decline and hybrid?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…tive exclusion of American Black Duck pairs from fertile wetlands (Merendino and Ankney 1994) have been suggested. Conversely, other studies have refuted earlier assumptions and provided contradictory evidence for each scenario (e.g., Conroy et al 1989, D'Eon et al 1994, Francis et al 1998, Hoysak and Ankney 1996, Petrie et al 2000, Seymour 1992). Much of the interest stemmed from the potential loss of American Black Ducks as a distinct species if the population decline and hybrid?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In duck species, hunting is thought to be a significant contribution to annual mortality [34]. We include this element of duck life history by increasing the mortality rate in both duck species during the hunting season (October-January) [35] (see §S4 in the electronic supplementary material for parameter details).…”
Section: Seasonal Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harvest rates are indexed to recovery rates (Francis et al ) where recovery rate is defined as the probability that the bird is killed by a hunter, retrieved, and reported (Brownie et al ). Under the Burnham live‐dead parameterization (Burnham ), when the majority of mortality is associated with harvested birds we assume the conditional reporting rate (the marked animal is recovered and reported; Seber ) also indexes harvest rate and therefore may be influenced by season regulations and harvest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%