With the introduction of the electroencephalographic technique in 1929 by Dr. Hans Berger (5), and with the subsequent verification of his original observations by Adrian and Matthews (1), Gibbs, Davis and Lennox (9), and Jasper and Carmichael (11), it became increasingly apparent that psychology had available a new tool which might be of value in uncovering some physiological correlates of 'mental' events.All of these pioneer investigators reported changes in the electrocortical record when a subject engaged in 'mental* activity. Later and more delimiting studies by Bagchi (3), Knott (13), Loomis, Harvey and Hobart (15), Travis (16), Travis, Knott and Griffith (18), and Travis and Knott (19,20) added to the body of experimental proof that there is a relationship between the electroencephalogram, as a physiological index, and 'mental' activity.Cruikshank (6), Jasper (11), Jasper and Cruikshank (12) and Travis and Hall ( 17) have made significant contributions to the correlation of sensation, .and after-sensation, and electrocortical phenomena, thus demonstrating the availability of electroencephalography in psychophysiological studies.Although the use of this new electrophysiological technique has been somewhat restricted, psychologically, to the study of sensation and centrally aroused processes, a few observa-* These investigators have not calculated the statistical significance of their observed differences, nor have they published sufficient data for such calculations to be made.• A preliminary survey of the approach has been published elsewhere in brief form (14).