1971
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(71)90031-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of reinforcement contingencies in increasing programmed reading and mathematics behaviors in first-grade children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

1974
1974
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recommended strategies for this type of motivation problem include rewards contingent on performance. A plethora of research has demonstrated that contingent reinforcement increases motivation to improve accurate task completion (Holt, 1971;Taffel & O'Leary, 1976) and performance (e.g., Noell et al, 1998). Motivation problems may also surface as a result of low skill fluency (Skinner, 1998).…”
Section: Bea and Mathematics Computationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recommended strategies for this type of motivation problem include rewards contingent on performance. A plethora of research has demonstrated that contingent reinforcement increases motivation to improve accurate task completion (Holt, 1971;Taffel & O'Leary, 1976) and performance (e.g., Noell et al, 1998). Motivation problems may also surface as a result of low skill fluency (Skinner, 1998).…”
Section: Bea and Mathematics Computationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two types of consequences that have been shown to improve students' reading performance are contingent reinforcement and performance feedback. Providing reinforcement (i.e., delivering preferred stimuli) contingent on accurate or increased oral reading responses has been shown to improve the reading performance of students in general and special education classrooms (Billingsley, 1977;Holt, 1971;Jenkins, Barksdale, & Clinton, 1978). Providing students with information about their behavior, or performance feedback, also has been demonstrated to be effective in improving the academic and behavioral functioning of elementary, secondary, and special education students (Kastelen, Nickel, & McLaughlin, 1984;Van Houten, Hill, & Parsons, 1975).…”
Section: Brian K Martens Syracuse Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. That reinforcement procedures were most effective when used with highly structured programmed materials (Holt, 1971;Sulzer et al, 1971). However, only one of these studies outlined procedures suitable for use in the normal classroom situation.…”
Section: The Effects Of Verbal Reinforcement and Contingency Managemementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Reinforcement principles have been utilised in the problem of teaching reading in a number of applied studies over the last ten years (Lahey & Durham, 1974;Holt, 1971;Gray, Baker & Stancyk, 1969;Sulzer, Hint & Krains, 1971;Staats & Butterfield, 1965;Staats, Minke & Wolf, 1964). These research studies outlined systematic steps to gain appropriate reading behaviours.…”
Section: The Effects Of Verbal Reinforcement and Contingency Managemementioning
confidence: 98%