2009
DOI: 10.1080/15377900802484661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting Intervention Strategies: Using Brief Experimental Analysis for Mathematics Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the findings of previous research (i.e., Carson and Eckert 2003;Codding et al 2009;Hendrickson et al 1996), the results of the current study suggest that BEA can effectively predict the most effective intervention for increasing student math fluency. For all three students, the BEA-predicted most effective intervention was congruent with the results of the extended intervention analysis of the targeted J Behav Educ (2012) 21:99-118 113 single skill.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to the findings of previous research (i.e., Carson and Eckert 2003;Codding et al 2009;Hendrickson et al 1996), the results of the current study suggest that BEA can effectively predict the most effective intervention for increasing student math fluency. For all three students, the BEA-predicted most effective intervention was congruent with the results of the extended intervention analysis of the targeted J Behav Educ (2012) 21:99-118 113 single skill.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate agreement between the results obtained during the BEA and extended intervention analysis phases by comparing all interventions as opposed to only the BEA-predicted intervention. Based on previous research (i.e., Carson and Eckert 2003;Codding et al 2009;Hendrickson et al 1996), we hypothesized that the intervention identified to yield the greatest performance (i.e., highest digits correct per minute; DCPM) in the BEA would also be identified as the most effective intervention in the extended intervention analysis. As CCC, TP, and MTM have yet to be compared in a single study, a secondary purpose of this study was to analyze both the efficacy and efficiency of these three math interventions for improving the math fluency of three students identified with math fluency deficits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies of healthy populations have indicated that extrinsic motivation can enhance reading fluency and math performance (Codding et al, 2009;Eckert, Ardoin, Daly, & Martens, 2002;Jones et al, 2009;Noell, Freeland, Witt, & Gansle, 2001). Motivational effects on academic fluency may be related to the finding that in healthy populations, brain structures associated with tasks involving reaction time show increased activation during conditions of enhanced motivation (Locke & Braver, 2008;Pochon et al, 2002;Taylor et al, 2004).…”
Section: Motivation Academic Fluency and The Cerebellummentioning
confidence: 96%
“…BEA has been used most often for selecting components of reading fluency interventions; however, in recent years, additional research has emerged that includes BEA of interventions for a variety of skill areas, including phonemic segmentation (Daly, Johnsons, & LeClair, ); letter formation and early writing (e.g., Burns, Ganuza, & London, ; Parker, Dickey, Burns, & McMaster, ); mathematics (Carson & Eckert, ; Codding et al., ; Mong & Mong, ; Reisener, Dufrene, Clark, Olmi, & Tingstrom, this issue; VanDerHeyden & Burns, ); and problem behaviors related to academics (Schmidt, Shanholtzer, Mezhoudi, Scherbak, & SungWoo, ).…”
Section: Problem Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%