2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of regulated deficit irrigation, partial root drying and N-fertilizer levels on sugar beet crop (Beta vulgaris L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a significant difference between the levels 100% and 75% of IWR and also between these two levels and water stress at 50 % of IWR. These results are in harmony with obtained by Abyaneh et al (2017) who reported that the increasing of nitrogen and irrigation water applications reasons a decrease in the sugar content.…”
Section: Juice Qualitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There was a significant difference between the levels 100% and 75% of IWR and also between these two levels and water stress at 50 % of IWR. These results are in harmony with obtained by Abyaneh et al (2017) who reported that the increasing of nitrogen and irrigation water applications reasons a decrease in the sugar content.…”
Section: Juice Qualitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, results of many studies report yield losses under water deficit conditions. Abyaneha et al [23] showed that irrigation treatments were significant for all quantitative and qualitative characteristics of sugar beet. By increasing the amount of irrigation water, root and white sugar yields increased while the sugar content decreased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of irrigation treatments, WUEagr increased by fertilization with the highest values found in APRI20 and FI; whereas it increased with decreasing amounts of the irrigation in DI regimes. Such a water-saving phenomenon of using RDI to reduce the amount of irrigation and increase WUE was also widely reported in herbal 9 , 31 , 49 and woody crops 8 , 14 , 29 with little or no yield penalty in most cases. The negative trend between total seed yield and WUEagr in DI regimes (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%