2019
DOI: 10.1177/0308518x19889634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of regional skill gaps and skill shortages on firm productivity

Abstract: This paper contributes to the literature on regional productivity, complementing previous education and skill-level perspectives with a novel approach analysing the impact of regional skill gaps and skill shortages. This allows us to reflect the idiosyncratic needs of the regional economic structure better, considering both the demand and supply side of the skills equation in localised labour markets. Controlling for unobserved time-invariant firm-level heterogeneity and other region–industry effects across a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This evidence is consistent with theories of trade-offs faced by firms clustering in thick local markets, between benefits linked to labour pooling and specialized suppliers, and higher costs of labour poaching and competition (Combes & Duranton, 2006). In this regard, labour poaching effects might be particularly relevant, given the skills shortages experienced in the UK, in particular in manufacturing industries (Calvo & Coulter, 2017;Haskel et al, 2005;Kemeny, 2017;Morris et al, 2019). In addition, this finding seems consistent with the recent evidence of 'superstar firms' in manufacturing industries, where rapid growth of mark-ups leads to an increased concentration of labour and skills in few fast-growing firms (Autor et al, 2017).…”
Section: Robustness Tests and Heterogeneity Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This evidence is consistent with theories of trade-offs faced by firms clustering in thick local markets, between benefits linked to labour pooling and specialized suppliers, and higher costs of labour poaching and competition (Combes & Duranton, 2006). In this regard, labour poaching effects might be particularly relevant, given the skills shortages experienced in the UK, in particular in manufacturing industries (Calvo & Coulter, 2017;Haskel et al, 2005;Kemeny, 2017;Morris et al, 2019). In addition, this finding seems consistent with the recent evidence of 'superstar firms' in manufacturing industries, where rapid growth of mark-ups leads to an increased concentration of labour and skills in few fast-growing firms (Autor et al, 2017).…”
Section: Robustness Tests and Heterogeneity Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In this regard, the agglomeration of fast-growth firms could facilitate, on the one hand, the match between skilled workers and firms' requirements, or the flow of labour and skills from fast-growth to other firms within the same industry. However, on the other hand, a rapid increase in the agglomeration of fast-growth firms could also create negative spillover effects related to labour poaching, where tougher competition in the local labour market could draw the limited numbers of skilled workers available towards the most successful firms in the cluster, that is, the fast-growth firms (Coad et al, 2014b;Combes & Duranton, 2006;Morris et al, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Several studies corroborate this negative skill shortage-productivity nexus (Bennett & McGuinness, 2009;Haskel & Martin, 1993;Haskel & Martin, 1996;Morris et al, 2020;Tang & Wang, 2005). Skill shortages may also constrain investment and the adoption of new technologies, with negative knock-on effects on productivity (see, e.g., Foley et al, 1993 andWatts, 1994 for theoretical arguments and Forth &Mason, 2006 andNickell &Nicolitsas, 1997 for empirical evidence).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There is a strong link between firm size and firm performance. The number of employees was also used to calculate firm size in (Morris, Vanino, and Corradini 2020). (Dosi, Guarascio, & Ricci, 2021) also used the number of employees as a measure of firm size and discovered that it was related to training and firm performance.…”
Section: Firm Sizementioning
confidence: 99%