2006
DOI: 10.1115/1.2753909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of RCC on the Reliability of Adhesive Flip Chip Joints

Abstract: A need for higher packaging density and functionality has increased the use of new packaging technologies, which has also caused demand for higher interconnect densities on printed circuit boards (PCBs). Sequential build-up (SBU) processes can be used to meet these demands. In the SBU process, additional dielectric and conductor layers are formed on a core board, which is typically made of FR-4. Microvias are formed on these layers to achieve an electrical connection between them and the core board. Resin-coat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contact area of the particles was reduced and the contact resistance increased (Frisk and Kokko, 2007). Water also penetrated the interface between the adhesive and the chip causing delamination and failures (Frisk and Kokko, 2007). According to this study conformal coating did not affect the failure mechanism.…”
Section: Failure Analysismentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The contact area of the particles was reduced and the contact resistance increased (Frisk and Kokko, 2007). Water also penetrated the interface between the adhesive and the chip causing delamination and failures (Frisk and Kokko, 2007). According to this study conformal coating did not affect the failure mechanism.…”
Section: Failure Analysismentioning
confidence: 83%
“…During the constant humidity test, Figure 2 All the test samples failed after 2,000 h of constant humidity testing in Test series A 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 Note: Four test samples were tested from both test series humidity permeated the epoxy-based adhesive matrix causing it to swell. The contact area of the particles was reduced and the contact resistance increased (Frisk and Kokko, 2007).…”
Section: Failure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the reason for failures in the test samples with ACF2 and substrate100 is assumed to be relaxation. A more detailed description of failure analysis is given in [10], [17], [18].…”
Section: Results After the Temperature Cycling Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is most likely due to the pliability of the RCC [10]. As the RCC deforms more than FR-4 under the pads, higher pressure is needed to deform the conductive particles than for substrates without the RCC.…”
Section: A Resistance Measurements Before Testingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Bonding time and temperature were chosen according to the ACF manufacturer's recommendation and results from earlier studies with the same materials [18][19][20]. A bonding pressure of 110 MPa was chosen, since it had been found to give good results for the same adhesive in other studies.…”
Section: Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%