2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ram exposure at the end of progestagen treatment on estrus synchronisation and fertility during the breeding season in ewes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
34
2
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
34
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the estrus response in group B (58.5 %) obtained in this study is higher than the 20 % obtained by Omontese et al (2010) sponges. This variation may be due to effect of age and parity, breed, nutrition, treatment protocol, location, management and climate (Mani et al, 1992;Romano, 2002;Evans et al, 2004). In the present study, most does in group A exhibited estrus earlier (p<0.05) and mostly within the first 72 hours after sponge withdrawal, while does in group B showed estrus behavior much later (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…On the other hand, the estrus response in group B (58.5 %) obtained in this study is higher than the 20 % obtained by Omontese et al (2010) sponges. This variation may be due to effect of age and parity, breed, nutrition, treatment protocol, location, management and climate (Mani et al, 1992;Romano, 2002;Evans et al, 2004). In the present study, most does in group A exhibited estrus earlier (p<0.05) and mostly within the first 72 hours after sponge withdrawal, while does in group B showed estrus behavior much later (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The use of vaginal progestin pessaries along with gonadotropin administration has been the method of choice for oestrus synchronisation in sheep and goats (Wildeus, 2000). This method has been used for oestrus induction (Zarkawi et al, 1999) and synchronisation (Evans et al, 2004) programmes. The responses of different breeds of sheep to oestrus synchronisation may vary [Reviewed by Wildeus (2000)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when compared with another study on Karakul ewes (Hashemi et al, 2006), the overall estrus response observed in this study (75.0% vs 93.3%) was lower. This might be attributed to the estrus enhancing effect of gonadotrophins administered at progestagen removal in their study, or to differences associated to the breed, location, management, season and nutritional status of the ewes (Menegatos et al, 2003;Evans et al, 2004;Ungerfeld, 2011). Although the estrus response did not differ between groups, the time to onset of estrus was significantly shorter in ewes treated with FGA than in those treated with CIDR.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%