2018
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of rainfall uncertainty on the performance of physically based rainfall–runoff models

Abstract: This paper analyses the effect of rain data uncertainty on the performance of two hydrological models with different spatial structures: a semidistributed and a fully distributed model. The study is performed on a small catchment of 19.6 km2 located in the north‐west of Spain, where the arrival of low pressure fronts from the Atlantic Ocean causes highly variable rainfall events. The rainfall fields in this catchment during a series of storm events are estimated using rainfall point measurements. The uncertain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the software Iber could not be validated in the study area because there are no available historical data to do so. However, the model has been extensively validated and applied in previous studies related to river inundation, tidal currents in estuaries, and rainfall-runoff modeling [21][22][23][24][25][26][27], showing its ability to represent 2D free surface shallow flows and river inundation processes. The 2D shallow water equations solved by the software Iber are a high-fidelity physically-based model, and they were assumed to be the best representation of the inundation process for the purposes of this work.…”
Section: Flood Inundation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the software Iber could not be validated in the study area because there are no available historical data to do so. However, the model has been extensively validated and applied in previous studies related to river inundation, tidal currents in estuaries, and rainfall-runoff modeling [21][22][23][24][25][26][27], showing its ability to represent 2D free surface shallow flows and river inundation processes. The 2D shallow water equations solved by the software Iber are a high-fidelity physically-based model, and they were assumed to be the best representation of the inundation process for the purposes of this work.…”
Section: Flood Inundation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpolation consists of either Eulerian or Lagrangian kriging, depending on their respective performance as assessed for each event through a cross-validation scheme [69]. The conditional simulation scheme from Vischel et al [46] has been used by others [70] to evaluate the effects of rainfall uncertainty on the performance of calibrated rainfall-runoff models. Figure 1c displays the spatial distribution of time-aggregated ensemble rainfall over the study period, as maps of the ensemble mean and standard deviation.…”
Section: Generating Stochastic Rainfieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in measurement and computational techniques have enabled us to consider additional physical processes for accurate flood forecasting. As knowledge regarding rainfall-runoff processes has developed and the related technologies and models have continued to advance, significant research efforts have focused on the accuracy and uncertainty of model input data because the accuracy of rainfall-runoff modeling relies heavily on input data [1][2][3]. Among the many types of input data, rainfall data is not only one of the most critical factors affecting the accuracy of runoff prediction [4], but also one of the factors that produce the highest degree of uncertainty [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, many studies have been conducted to reduce the uncertainty originating from rainfall data. For example, Fraga et al [2] recently investigated the effects of rainfall data uncertainty on the performance of hydrological models in a small basin (~10 km 2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%