2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Prone Positioning on the Respiratory Support of Nonintubated Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Abstract: COVID-19-associated respiratory illness may lead to ARDS. 1 In intubated patients with severe ARDS, early, prolonged, and repeated sessions of prone positioning (PP) decrease mortality rates. 2,3 Awake PP is feasible, improves oxygenation in some patients, and may prevent respiratory worsening, [4][5][6] The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of PP on the outcome of spontaneously breathing patients with COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure. MethodsWe designed an exposed/nonexpose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the search of the literature, 99 records were retrieved, of which only 9 studies [10][11][12][19][20][21][22][23][24] were observational comparison-group studies including both AP and supine patients, with sufficient information to calculate the overall risk of intubation, which are summarised alongside the APRONOX study in Figure 3; the funnel plot is provided as Appendix 9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the search of the literature, 99 records were retrieved, of which only 9 studies [10][11][12][19][20][21][22][23][24] were observational comparison-group studies including both AP and supine patients, with sufficient information to calculate the overall risk of intubation, which are summarised alongside the APRONOX study in Figure 3; the funnel plot is provided as Appendix 9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four RCTs 6,20,22,23 were of moderate quality, and one RCT 17 was of high quality. Six observational studies 5,13,15,16,19,21 had a total score >6, indicating that they were of high quality. Three observational studies 14,18,24 scored 6, indicating that they were of moderate quality.…”
Section: Quality and Publication Bias Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 Awake prone positioning has been associated with improved oxygenation in observational studies of non-intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome 8 and, more recently, in patients with severe COVID-19. 9 , 10 , 11 Two small (n=30 and n=60) pilot trials studied the feasibility of awake prone positioning in non-intubated patients but did not have the power to show improvement in oxygenation, escalation of respiratory support, or mortality. 12 , 13 Despite the paucity of large scale randomised controlled evidence evaluating patient-centred outcomes, awake prone positioning generated great interest in the clinical and scientific communities, and it has been incorporated into clinical guidelines 14 and expert consensus statements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%