2013
DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2012.684704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of processing parameters on physical and structural properties of lightweight foam core sandwich panels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the polystyrene may contribute to binding because during the panels manufacturing, polystyrene expands between the wood particles, so that the particles are positively connected. On the other hand, wooden coarse particles are surrounded by expanded hydrophobic materials what reduces the accessibility of water molecules to the OH groups (Shalbafan et al 2013b). Increasing amount of expandable fillers (from 5 to 15 %) leads to a more reduced TS for both panel densities and thicknesses.…”
Section: Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the polystyrene may contribute to binding because during the panels manufacturing, polystyrene expands between the wood particles, so that the particles are positively connected. On the other hand, wooden coarse particles are surrounded by expanded hydrophobic materials what reduces the accessibility of water molecules to the OH groups (Shalbafan et al 2013b). Increasing amount of expandable fillers (from 5 to 15 %) leads to a more reduced TS for both panel densities and thicknesses.…”
Section: Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the higher amount of voids in lightweight panels the water can penetrate faster into the samples, especially into the core layer of the samples. This can lead to more water absorption by the samples as well as more thickness swelling after the first 2 h of soaking (Shalbafan et al 2013b). It is worth mentioning that all tests were carried out on unsanded boards, which means that press skin has not been removed.…”
Section: Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TS in foam core panels is influenced by the surface layer thickness (Luedtke 2011). It seems that the wooden particles were saturated after a short time (48 h) of soaking, and this condition does not vary with the prolongation of soaking until 786 h (Shalbafan et al 2013a). It has to be also considered that the foam core layer has no influence on thickness swelling because of its hydrophobic nature.…”
Section: Effect Of Layer Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The least improvement was obtained with FRV adhered with FUA and processing temperature of 160°C (Figure ). Our microscopic observation of the surface layer densification revealed a relatively low compacted surface layer (in panels produced with a processing temperature of 160°C) in which some of the adhesive can penetrate into the surface layers, resulting in a relatively weak bond as well as in higher porosity for the volatiles to flow . Additionally, the FUA is described in the EnviroGraf literature as to not give adhesive strength at high temperatures during cone test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For each surface layer thickness, 4 panel replicates were produced. Shalbafan et al described in detail the pressing schedules and foaming conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%