2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.03.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of preparation conditions on magnetoelectric properties of CoFe2O4–BaTiO3 magnetoelectric composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5b), assigned to a higher composite density (93% of the theoretical maximum for the 1 200 °C sample). The mechanical coupling between the FE and FM phases becomes more efficient as the sample density increases, explaining this result 30. The CFO XRD‐derived particle size increases with sintering temperature (see the Supporting Information, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5b), assigned to a higher composite density (93% of the theoretical maximum for the 1 200 °C sample). The mechanical coupling between the FE and FM phases becomes more efficient as the sample density increases, explaining this result 30. The CFO XRD‐derived particle size increases with sintering temperature (see the Supporting Information, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…7). The values of H max in these composites are comparable to the fields at which the coupling coefficient k = λ d λ /d H is maximized (1.57 kOe – here λ is the magnetostriction of the ferrite component) 30. Variation from this value can be attributed to microstructure control of domain wall motion – the higher H c in the smaller CFO particle size composite is due to more numerous pinning sites, which therefore require a higher field to saturate the magnetostriction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This surface effect contributes largely to the magneto electric coupling. 18 Also, charge redistribution induced by the interfacial boundaries of the ferroelectric layer may also induce changes in ferromagnetic ordering as per the polarization direction and thereby contributing to the giant magnetoelectric response. 27 The investigation directly points towards the possible applications in the microelectronics and MEMS industry.…”
Section: Magnetoelectric Coupling Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the coupling coefficient dropped substantially at biasing magnetic fields above 20 Oe. 17 Duong and Groessinger 18 in 2007 reported that microstructure of the ferroelectric and ferromagnetic layers of ME composites also plays an important role in deciding the ME effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%