Effect of population density on epidemics

Abstract

Investigations of a possible connection between population density and the propagation and magnitude of epidemics have so far led to mixed and unconvincing results. There are three reasons for that. (i) Previous studies did not focus on the appropriate density interval. (ii) For the density to be a meaningful variable the population must be distributed as uniformly as possible. If an area has towns and cities where a majority of the population is concentrated its average density is meaningless. (iii) In the propagation of an epidemic the initial proportion of susceptibles (that is to say persons who have not developed an immunity) is an essential, yet usually unknown, factor. The assumption that most of the population is susceptible holds only for new strain of diseases. It will be shown that when these requirements are taken care of, the size of epidemics is indeed closely connected with the population density. This empirical observation comes as a welcome confirmation of the classical KMK (Kermack-McKendrick 1927) model. Indeed, one of its key predictions is that the size of the epidemic increases strongly (and in a non linear way) with the initial density of susceptibles. An interesting consequence is that, contrary to common beliefs, in sparsely populated territories, like Alaska, Australia or the west coast of the United states the size of epidemics among native populations must have been limited by the low density even for diseases for which the natives had no immunity (i.e., were susceptibles).Provisional. Comments are welcome.

Epidemiology of Coronavirus Disease in Gansu Province, China, 2020

“…For example, cases have been reported in Wuwei, a city in a remote, mountainous, hard-to-reach area in Gansu Province. Our findings are supported by other studies, which demonstrate a close correlation with population and economy in other major cities of China where outbreaks of COVID-19 occurred within 1-2 weeks of the original outbreak in Wuhan (23)(24)(25).…”

Robust and fragile determinants of the infection and case fatality rates of Covid-19: international cross-sectional evidence

“…Explanatory variable number seven is population density, which is conducive to the spreading of pandemics and epidemics as recognized by, inter alia, by Tarwater and Martin (2001), Maybery (1999), Li, Richmond, and Roehner (2018), and by Sumdani et al (2014). Tarwater and Martin (2001) reach the conclusion that because density affects the contact rate, it has a 'dramatic effect on the distribution of contacts over time, the magnitude of the outbreak, and, ultimately, the spread of disease'.…”

Country-level factors associated with the early spread of COVID-19 cases at 5, 10 and 15 days since the onset

“…Many of these are in developed countries with sound surveillance systems in place leading to a greater concerns over the poorer countries that could experience far greater suffering (Peters et al, 2020). Poverty and inequality contribute to the burden exacerbating the spread of infectious diseases (Goscé & Johansson, 2018;Jackson & Stephenson, 2014;Li et al, 2018;Quinn & Kumar, 2014), while the lack of resources and underfunded health systems severely limit the country's capacity to cope with the extent of this pandemic. This makes early detection and containment their top priority (Sharfstein et al, 2020).…”