1983
DOI: 10.1104/pp.73.1.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Pod Removal on Leaf Photosynthesis and Soluble Protein Composition of Field-Grown Soybeans

Abstract: Well nodulated, field-grown soybeans (Glycine max [L.] Meff. var Williams) were depodded just prior to seed development and near mid pod-fill. Both treatments caused a considerable increase in leaf dry weight, suggesting continued photosynthate production following pod removal. Moreover, depodding had a marked effect on leaf soluble protein without affecting total proteolytic activity. Early depodding caused a 50% increase in leaf protein, and both early and late depodding caused the retention of protein … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

11
83
2

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(4 reference statements)
11
83
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this possibility is the well-established finding that source leaves adjust their photosynthetic rates in response to the demand for photoassimilates in the rest of the plant, inhibiting photosynthesis when the demand is low and increasing photosynthesis when the demand is high (sink regulation of photosynthesis) (reviewed by Turgeon, 1989;von Schaewen et al, 1990;Stitt et al, 1990;Stitt, 1991;Sonnewald and Willmitzer, 1992). It has also been observed that the rate of leaf senescence is affected by the sinksource status of the plant (Christensen et al, 1981;Bin Lazan et al, 1983;Wittenbach, 1983;Shibles et al, 1987;Guitman et al, 1991) and that photosynthetic gene expression can be modulated by carbohydrates at the transcriptional level (Sheen, 1990;Krapp et al, 1993). We are currently investigating the impact of carbohydrate levels on photosynthetic rates and Rubisco gene expression during leaf development in the antisense and WT plants.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Consistent with this possibility is the well-established finding that source leaves adjust their photosynthetic rates in response to the demand for photoassimilates in the rest of the plant, inhibiting photosynthesis when the demand is low and increasing photosynthesis when the demand is high (sink regulation of photosynthesis) (reviewed by Turgeon, 1989;von Schaewen et al, 1990;Stitt et al, 1990;Stitt, 1991;Sonnewald and Willmitzer, 1992). It has also been observed that the rate of leaf senescence is affected by the sinksource status of the plant (Christensen et al, 1981;Bin Lazan et al, 1983;Wittenbach, 1983;Shibles et al, 1987;Guitman et al, 1991) and that photosynthetic gene expression can be modulated by carbohydrates at the transcriptional level (Sheen, 1990;Krapp et al, 1993). We are currently investigating the impact of carbohydrate levels on photosynthetic rates and Rubisco gene expression during leaf development in the antisense and WT plants.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…This age-related, progressive loss of photosynthetic function from the time of leaf maturity may be a general feature of annual plants because this phenomenon has been observed in cucumber (Callow, 1974), Perilla (Batt and Woolhouse, 1975), barley (Friedrich and Huffaker, 1980), wheat (Peoples et al, 1980), maize (Crafts-Brandner et al, 1984a), and soybean (Wittenbach, 1982;Ford and Shibles, 1988). Wittenbach referred to the photosynthetic decline as "functional senescence" to distinguish this process from the subsequent rapid loss of chlorophyll and macromolecular turnover associated with the senescence syndrome (Wittenbach, 1983). The physiological basis for functional senescence is not known, although a number of explanations have been suggested (Callow, 1974;Woolhouse, 1982;Nooden, 1988b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, depodding of soybean plants will delay the final stages of senescence in the leaf but does not prevent photosynthetic decline (Wittenbach, 1982;CraftsBrandner et al, 1984b). In fact, the Rubisco enzyme may be degraded in leaves of depodded plants, but the mobilized N is apparently refixed in the paraveinal mesophyll as storage protein (Franceschi et al, 1983;Wittenbach, 1983). Thus, in soybean, depodding appears to result in uncoupling of photosynthetic decline from activation of the senescence syndrome.…”
Section: (C) Rbcs (D) Ef-1a (E) Sag2 (F)sag4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of an altered reproductive sink demand on accumulation of VSP have been limited to studies of soybean (5,18,19,25,26). Because depodding, JA, and MeJA elicit similar VSP accumulation responses in soybean, other monocarpic annuals that express MeJA-induced proteins also may accumulate proteins with VSP characteristics when reproductive sink demand is altered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…plants, abundant levels of the same specific vegetative proteins (molecular masses of 27, 29, and 94 kD) accumulate predominantly in the vacuoles of PVM cells of leaves (5,7,18,19,21). The 94-kD protein was recently identified as a member of the vegetative lipoxygenase family and proposed to be a bifunctional zymogen capable of catalyzing the hydroperoxidation of lipids and storing excess N temporarily (21).The effects of an altered reproductive sink demand on accumulation of VSP have been limited to studies of soybean (5,18,19,25,26). Because depodding, JA, and MeJA elicit similar VSP accumulation responses in soybean, other monocarpic annuals that express MeJA-induced proteins also may accumulate proteins with VSP characteristics when reproductive sink demand is altered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%