Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Bone Grafting of Alveolar Clefts

Sakio, Reiko; Sakamoto, Yoshiaki; Ogata, Hisao; Sakamoto, Teruo; Ishii, Takenobu; Kishi, Kazuo

doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000003345

Cited by 30 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A pressing need exists for the development of a consistent optimized imaging protocol for diagnosis and follow up of SABG in CLP patients, since imaging protocols differed significantly between studies. If a CLP team would like to change the imaging protocol 7 VR 49,5% VR 52% Honma 21 VR 115% VR 99% Feichtinger 24 VR 36% Oberoi 1 VR 84% Pradel 5 VR 37% Herford 11 VR 78% Zhang 2 RR 29% Nagashima 4 RR 47% Sakio 18 RR 45% Feichtinger 30 VR 51% VR 50% Dissaux 15 VR 46%; 63% Movahedian Attar 40 VR 74% 25 MS BF 87% Behnia 29 Triade BF 51% Sakio 18 IC + PRP RR 50% Pradel 5 TEB BF 41%…”

Section: Conclusion and Remarks For Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three-dimensional radiological evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate patients: a systematic review

Mulder

Llano-Pérula

Jacobs

et al. 2019

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The search yielded 1735 citations, of which 38 met the inclusion criteria. We noticed a large variability in imaging protocols and bone graft evaluation methods between studies. Most articles were observational studies with medium to low methodological quality, except for the one randomised clinical trial having a low risk of bias. Conclusions: There is a lack of prospective, controlled trials based on a consistent imaging protocol with a sufficiently long follow-up period. A pressing need exists for the development of a consistent optimized imaging protocol for diagnosis and follow up of SABG in CLP patients. Although 3D evaluation methods seem to be more precise than two-dimensional methods, we should be careful when comparing the outcomes arising from different 3D measuring techniques.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion and Remarks For Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three-dimensional radiological evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate patients: a systematic review

Mulder

Llano-Pérula

Jacobs

et al. 2019

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, Deshpande, et al (26) evaluated the value of PRP in bone grafting procedures in alveolar cleft patients and the results showed less bone resorption in the study group. On the other hand, Sakio et al (27) studied the effect of PRP on bone graft resorption when used to repair alveolar clefts. The results showed no significant value of PRP on bone graft resorption.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Anterior Maxillary Horizontal Ridge Augmentation With Simultanous Implant Placement Using Cerabone® Versus Cerabone® Combined With Platelet Rich Plasma (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Ibrahim

Khalil

Halawani

2021

Alexandria Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTION:Rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla using dental implants is frequently problematic because of the deficiency of alveolar ridge width. Under certain conditions ridge augmentation with simultaneous implant placement is recommended. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate horizontal augmentation of narrow anterior maxillary alveolar ridge with simultaneous implant placement using Cerabone® with and without platelet rich plasma (PRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 14 implants were placed in patients with insufficient alveolar ridge width in the maxillary lateral incisor region. Patients were divided into two groups; In Group "1" Cerabone® only was used as an augmentation material while in Group "2" a mixture of Cerabone® and PRP was used. A collagen membrane was used to cover the grafting material. Postoperative pain was assessed using visual analogue scale. Healing and postoperative edema were evaluated. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) was obtained before surgery, immediately postoperatively and after 6 months so that the labial bone width and bone density were evaluated. Osstell was used to evaluate implant stability quotient (ISQ) during surgery and after 6 months. RESULTS: All implants in both groups were successfully osseointegrated and functionally stable. No significant difference in postoperative pain, edema or wound healing was detected between the two groups. The mean percentage of change in ISQ was superior in Group "2" when compared to Group "1", but statistically there was no significant difference (P=0.898). The labial bone width in Group "2" was significantly higher than that of Group "1" (P=0.002). The mean percentage of change in labial bone density was 57.95% in Group "1" and 112.52% in Group "2" (P=0.848). CONCLUSION: Cerabone® can be used effectively for guided bone regeneration around dental implant in narrow maxillary anterior alveolar ridges. Moreover, the addition of PRP has a positive effect on bone regeneration around implants.

show abstract

“…On the other hand, Sakio et al (27) studied the effect of PRP on bone graft resorption when used to repair alveolar clefts. The results showed no significant value of PRP on bone graft resorption.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Anterior Maxillary Horizontal Ridge Augmentation With Simultanous Implant Placement Using Cerabone® Versus Cerabone® Combined With Platelet Rich Plasma (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Ibrahim

Khalil

Halawani

2020

Alexandria Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Rehabilitation of the anterior maxilla using dental implants is frequently problematic because of the deficiency of alveolar ridge width. Under certain conditions ridge augmentation with simultaneous implant placement is recommended. Objectives:To evaluate horizontal augmentation of narrow anterior maxillary alveolar ridge with simultaneous implant placement using Cerabone® with and without platelet rich plasma (PRP). Materials and Methods:In this study, 14 implants were placed in patients with insufficient alveolar ridge width in the maxillary lateral incisor region. Patients were divided into two groups; In Group "1" Cerabone® only was used as an augmentation material while in Group "2" a mixture of Cerabone® and PRP was used. A collagen membrane was used to cover the grafting material. Postoperative pain was assessed using visual analogue scale. Healing and postoperative edema were evaluated. Cone 2 Alexandria Dental Journal. Volume XX Issue X.Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) was obtained before surgery, immediately postoperatively and after 6 months so that the labial bone width and bone density were evaluated. Osstell was used to evaluate implant stability quotient (ISQ) during surgery and after 6 months.Results: All implants in both groups were successfully osseointegrated and functionally stable. No significant difference in postoperative pain, edema or wound healing was detected between the two groups. The mean percentage of change in ISQ was superior in Group "2" when compared to Group "1", but statistically there was no significant difference (P=0.898). The labial bone width in Group "2" was significantly higher than that of Group "1" (P=0.002). The mean percentage of change in labial bone density was 57.95% in Group "1" and 112.52% in Group "2" (P=0.848). Conclusion:Cerabone® can be used effectively for guided bone regeneration around dental implant in narrow maxillary anterior alveolar ridges. Moreover, the addition of PRP has a positive effect on bone regeneration around implants.

show abstract

Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Bone Grafting of Alveolar Clefts

Cited by 30 publications

References 21 publications

Three-dimensional radiological evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate patients: a systematic review

Three-dimensional radiological evaluation of secondary alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate patients: a systematic review

Evaluation of Anterior Maxillary Horizontal Ridge Augmentation With Simultanous Implant Placement Using Cerabone® Versus Cerabone® Combined With Platelet Rich Plasma (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Evaluation of Anterior Maxillary Horizontal Ridge Augmentation With Simultanous Implant Placement Using Cerabone® Versus Cerabone® Combined With Platelet Rich Plasma (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About