1991
DOI: 10.1002/app.1991.070430206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of plasma treatments on wettability of polysulfone and polyetherimide

Abstract: SYNOPSISExperimental results on plasma treatments of polysulfone and polyetherimide to improve the wettability of these polymers are presented. The plasma is characterized by optical emission spectroscopy. The wettability of the polymer surfaces were checked by contact angle measurements and ESCA is used to compare the surfaces before and after plasma treatment. Correlations between contact angle, concentration of oxygen at the surface, and optical emission intensity of the OH radical have been established. Op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this hydrophobicity leads to hydrophobic interactions with, e.g., proteins resulting in a fouling layer precipitated on the membrane surface accompanied by a decreased membrane performance [1,2]. The common way to face this problem is to hydrophilize the hydrophobic membrane material [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] with different modification methods like grafting reactions [6,[8][9][10][11][12], electron beam (EB) irradiation [13,14] or plasma treatment [5,[15][16][17][18][19][20]. The hydrophilized membrane surfaces then show an increased fouling resistance due to the buildup of a water film on the membrane surface, which repels hydrophobic fouling reagents [21].…”
Section: Membrane Surface Hydrophilicity and Surface Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this hydrophobicity leads to hydrophobic interactions with, e.g., proteins resulting in a fouling layer precipitated on the membrane surface accompanied by a decreased membrane performance [1,2]. The common way to face this problem is to hydrophilize the hydrophobic membrane material [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] with different modification methods like grafting reactions [6,[8][9][10][11][12], electron beam (EB) irradiation [13,14] or plasma treatment [5,[15][16][17][18][19][20]. The hydrophilized membrane surfaces then show an increased fouling resistance due to the buildup of a water film on the membrane surface, which repels hydrophobic fouling reagents [21].…”
Section: Membrane Surface Hydrophilicity and Surface Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] Once the ES fiber mat was generated, it was first treated with one minute of air plasma to improve the wettability by introducing hydroxyl and charged carboxylated groups on the surface. [15] The ES fiber mat was then immediately immersed into a 0.2 wt.% aqueous solution of branched polyethylenimine (BPEI) for 10 min to impart positive charge on the surface of ES fibers. Ten bilayers of poly(sodium 4-styrene-sulfonate) (SPS) and poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDAC) film were deposited on the ES fiber mat as base layers to facilitate a more effective electrostatic assembly of MWNT films by creating uniformly charged surfaces on the ES fibers.…”
Section: Submitted To 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane hydrophilization appears among those most frequently studied. This process can improve separation, chemical resistance and protection against fouling [3][4][5][6]. Polyethylene microfiltration membranes were hydrophilized by using ternary mixtures of ethanol/water/inorganic acids [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%