2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of plants and surface loading rate on the treatment efficiency of shallow subsurface constructed wetlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the CWs without substrates, the retention of particulate material, removal of TSS, and the retention of TP and TKN were lower than in the CWs with substrates, probably because the particulate material is only retained by sedimentation and/or by the roots of the free‐floating macrophytes (Henares & Camargo, ). The highest removal rates of both inorganic forms of nitrogen, phosphorus and DKN in wetland Ec can be attributed to the uptake by the macrophytes, as previously documented (Carballeira et al., ; Henry‐Silva & Camargo, ; Kumari & Tripathi, ; Vera, García, Sáez, Moragas & Vidal, ). Aquatic macrophytes with great biomass and fast growth, like as E. crassipes and Pistia stratiotes , likely require more nutrients and, therefore, remove nutrients efficiently from the water column.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the CWs without substrates, the retention of particulate material, removal of TSS, and the retention of TP and TKN were lower than in the CWs with substrates, probably because the particulate material is only retained by sedimentation and/or by the roots of the free‐floating macrophytes (Henares & Camargo, ). The highest removal rates of both inorganic forms of nitrogen, phosphorus and DKN in wetland Ec can be attributed to the uptake by the macrophytes, as previously documented (Carballeira et al., ; Henry‐Silva & Camargo, ; Kumari & Tripathi, ; Vera, García, Sáez, Moragas & Vidal, ). Aquatic macrophytes with great biomass and fast growth, like as E. crassipes and Pistia stratiotes , likely require more nutrients and, therefore, remove nutrients efficiently from the water column.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The efficiency of CWs depends on the type of system (e.g., horizontal vs. vertical flow; subsurface vs. surface flow; the arrangement of macrophytes in the wetland; the presence or absence of substrate), the limnological characteristics of the effluent, the local climate conditions, and also the species and nutritional requirements of macrophytes (Carballeira, Ruiz & Soto, ; Hernández‐Crespo, Oliver, Bixquert, Gargallo & Martín, ; Wang, Zhang, Dong, & Tan, ; Wu et al., ). In temperate regions, constructed wetlands for the treatment of aquaculture effluents commonly used emergent macrophytes (Vymazal, ; Wu et al., ) and these macrophytes require a substrate for fixation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Halophytes can be integrated in IMTA systems through modules that allow for sustained plant growth and water (re)circulation, and the 2 main structures used for that purpose are usually constructed wetlands (CWs) and aquaponics systems. CWs have proven to be efficient at removing a wide range of organic and inorganic substances from different wastewater sources (Verhoeven & Meuleman 1999, Imfeld et al 2009, Vymazal 2010, 2011, Shelef et al 2013) including aquaculture (de Lange et al 2013, Turcios & Papenbrock 2014, Carballeira et al 2016. Aquaponics systems, on the other hand, have been mostly experimented with freshwater setups (Somerville et al 2014, dos Santos 2016.…”
Section: Halophytes -The New Players In Sustainable Marine Aquaculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuchs et al (2011) found lesser removal rate of TN and P using phragmites Australis which was as 35.6 % and 31% respectively. As indicated by Carballeira et al (2016), P.…”
Section: Phragmites Australismentioning
confidence: 95%