2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of placement of piezoelectric material and proof mass on the performance of piezoelectric energy harvester

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to these frequency mismatches a new trend has recently emerged with the development of electrical techniques [9,10] and power management circuits [11,12] able to tune the resonant frequency of piezoelectric cantilevers thanks to the coupling effect between the mechanical dynamics and the electrical circuit. For that purpose, the design and the fabrication of piezoelectric harvesters exhibiting a very strong global electromechanical coupling coefficient are mandatory and open up promising perspectives for broadband vibration energy harvesting, but a systematic model for optimizing piezoelectric cantilevers with a long proof mass is missing in the state of the art [13]. This paper proposes an analytical study corroborated by experimental results to give general guidelines on the geometrical and material parameters that influence the cantilever's 2 in order to maximize it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In response to these frequency mismatches a new trend has recently emerged with the development of electrical techniques [9,10] and power management circuits [11,12] able to tune the resonant frequency of piezoelectric cantilevers thanks to the coupling effect between the mechanical dynamics and the electrical circuit. For that purpose, the design and the fabrication of piezoelectric harvesters exhibiting a very strong global electromechanical coupling coefficient are mandatory and open up promising perspectives for broadband vibration energy harvesting, but a systematic model for optimizing piezoelectric cantilevers with a long proof mass is missing in the state of the art [13]. This paper proposes an analytical study corroborated by experimental results to give general guidelines on the geometrical and material parameters that influence the cantilever's 2 in order to maximize it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conclude that, within the linear response, the generated power is maximal for proof masses occupying 60%-70% of the total cantilever length. More recently, in 2019, Pradeesh and Udhayakumar [13] revealed, through FEM simulations of unimorph cantilevers with moderate proof mass sizes, that the shape of the proof mass has a minimal effect on the power harvested relative to its mass. Although these works provide interesting results, none of them is based on a comprehensive analytical study corroborated by experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 g of body load was applied to energy harvester. Isotropic damping factor 0.05 [25,30] was considered for energy harvester. The mass of accelerometer was applied at the free end of the cantilever beam.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 g of body load was given for energy harvester. 0.05 isotropic damping factor was [25,30] applied for both substrate and piezoelectric material. From various sizes of mesh analysis, it was found that the normal triangular mesh produces a better result at less time step along with the step frequency of 0.25 Hz.…”
Section: Numerical Analysis Of Considered Energy Harvestersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They employed a device manufactured by Mide Technology ® (Mide Technology Corporation, Medford, USA) and elaborated the transducer modeling using an electrical model. Pradeesh et al [25] reported a PEH cantilever composed of Al and PZT-5A, which can generate an output voltage of 23.05 V at 93.7 Hz. These researchers studied the effect of the position of the piezoelectric material and proof mass along the cantilever using multiple computational simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%