2013
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of percutaneous atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale device closure on degree of aortic regurgitation

Abstract: Percutaneous device closure of PFO or ASD does not increase the incidence or severity of AR over medium-term follow-up.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6,35 Whether device closure of ASD carries a risk of progressive aortic insufficiency remains controversial. 12,45 In our case series of large ASDs, neither device erosion nor delayed aortic regurgitation occurred, and no other long-term complications developed. Supraventricular arrhythmias resolved in 47.4% of patients and persistent or newly developed atrial fibrillation was well controlled medically, in keeping with previous reports.…”
Section: Long-term Outcomes After Large Asd Closurementioning
confidence: 63%
“…5,6,35 Whether device closure of ASD carries a risk of progressive aortic insufficiency remains controversial. 12,45 In our case series of large ASDs, neither device erosion nor delayed aortic regurgitation occurred, and no other long-term complications developed. Supraventricular arrhythmias resolved in 47.4% of patients and persistent or newly developed atrial fibrillation was well controlled medically, in keeping with previous reports.…”
Section: Long-term Outcomes After Large Asd Closurementioning
confidence: 63%
“…The Doppler technique is highly sensitive to small leakages, so these regurgitations may be only a few milliliters [19] . In a recent follow-up study after percutaneous closure, the presence of trace AR was not regarded as AR [20] . With this approach, the current study thus shows AR in only one patient (2%) and no new AR after closure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%