2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-35552011005000011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pelvic floor muscle training on labour and newborn outcomes: a randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
1
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
35
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showing that PFM strength and endurance did not influence delivery outcome support findings from three previous randomized controlled trials in which there were no deleterious impact on variables between women assigned to PFMT or controls [5,6,17]. In one study fewer had deliveries with prolonged second stage in the PFM training group and there were no differences in operative vaginal delivery, episiotomy, 3 rd or 4 th degree tears, epidural analgesia or oxytocin augmentation [5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The results showing that PFM strength and endurance did not influence delivery outcome support findings from three previous randomized controlled trials in which there were no deleterious impact on variables between women assigned to PFMT or controls [5,6,17]. In one study fewer had deliveries with prolonged second stage in the PFM training group and there were no differences in operative vaginal delivery, episiotomy, 3 rd or 4 th degree tears, epidural analgesia or oxytocin augmentation [5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Beckmann CR et al also reported lesser need of oxytocin augmentation. 20 Meconium stained liquor was less frequent in the study group (13.11%) as compared to control group (41%) which was found to be statistically significant, similar results shown in a study by Clapp 18,23,27,[30][31][32] Mean birth weight was higher in study group than control group which was found to be statistically significant. Agur et al and Hatch MC et al also reported greater weight among new-borns in their training group.…”
Section: Labour Outcomessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Barakat R and Dias et al also didn't find any differences regarding gestational age at birth. 17,18 Median maternal weight was more in study group than control group which was found to be statistically significant. A study by Price BB et al showed no significant differences in weight gain during pregnancy.…”
Section: Labour Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Few studies used PFMT aiming birth outcomes. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Du et al in a systematic review with meta-analysis found that PFMT during pregnancy was effective in reducing the time of the first and second stages of labor in primiparae. 10 In contrast, it was not found significant association between antenatal PFMT with the reduction in episiotomy rates, need for instrumental vaginal delivery and a reduction at the risk of perineal laceration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%