2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of passage number and matrix characteristics on differentiation of endothelial cells cultured for tissue engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Endothelial cell compatibility testing of biomaterials has been similar; and involves the growth and spread of cells on the materials as well as study of the effects that the biomaterial has on endothelial cell inflammatory potential and the angiogenic potential of the cells to migrate and form microcapillary-like structures or microvessels [12,[35][36][37][38]. The bone biomaterials used in these studies are being used successfully in humans.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Endothelial cell compatibility testing of biomaterials has been similar; and involves the growth and spread of cells on the materials as well as study of the effects that the biomaterial has on endothelial cell inflammatory potential and the angiogenic potential of the cells to migrate and form microcapillary-like structures or microvessels [12,[35][36][37][38]. The bone biomaterials used in these studies are being used successfully in humans.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…13 One milliliter of the composed matrix comprised 5 mg in-house isolated human cryoprecipitate (clottable fibrinogen and fibronectin), 0.2% gelatin (Sigma), and 100 μg hyaluronic acid (in-house purified and characterized 14 ), 20 μg of released platelet growth factor (PGF) prepared per Resmi et al, 15 25 μg laminin V (Sigma), and 250 ng recombinant epidermal growth factor (EGF; Sigma). Briefly, matrix composite was clotted on thrombin adsorbed TCPS to get a thin fibrin layer, and dishes were lyophilized under sterile atmosphere using a freeze drier (Edwards, Modulyo 4K).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sharp delineation with regard to post-treatment adhesion programs between liposuction and excision isolation techniques in age and BMI-matched donors suggests that there is an important difference in either the population of cells obtained by each method or a phenotypic change caused by one method that is not caused by the other. It is possible that cells obtained by liposuction have experienced some degree of phenotypic change caused by mechanical agitation from the liposuction cannula or infusion of large boluses of saline solution; however, it is unlikely that such a phenotypic change would persist after three passages of expansion in culture [35,36]. A more likely explanation for these observations is that there is some population present or enriched in the liposuction aspirate that is not present (or present to a lesser degree) in the panniculectomy excision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%