1972
DOI: 10.2337/diab.21.1.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Obesity on Insulin Sensitivity of Human Adipose Tissue

Abstract: Subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue was removed from six normal weight patients (118–184 lb.) at laparotomy and six obese subjects (280–533 lb.) under local anesthesia and incubated in vitro. Glucose-C-14 incorporation into CO2, total lipids and glycogen were measured. Although insulin (10 mU./ml.) stimulated CO2 production from glucose in all twelve subjects (p < .001), the average increase was only 26.6 per cent (5.3 to 50.8). Radioactive glucose incorporation into total lipids was increased by insu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Close anthropometric matching between groups implies a central role for obesity, rather than glucose dysregulation, as dictating peripheral insulin action. Indeed, previous work has noted far greater differences in peripheral insulin action when obese NGT vs. lean NGT is compared (10,20) than when obese NGT vs. prediabetes is compared (36,46). In summary, no differences were noted in peripheral insulin action between IFG, IFG/IGT, and NGT in the current study.…”
Section: Combined Ifg and Igtcontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Close anthropometric matching between groups implies a central role for obesity, rather than glucose dysregulation, as dictating peripheral insulin action. Indeed, previous work has noted far greater differences in peripheral insulin action when obese NGT vs. lean NGT is compared (10,20) than when obese NGT vs. prediabetes is compared (36,46). In summary, no differences were noted in peripheral insulin action between IFG, IFG/IGT, and NGT in the current study.…”
Section: Combined Ifg and Igtcontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…More surprising was the lack of notable decrement in peripheral insulin action in either IFG or IFG/IGT vs. NGT in the current study and may relate to the close anthropometric matching between groups. Previous work has implicated obesity (10,20), rather than glucose dysregulation (36,46), in the decline of peripheral insulin action characteristic of diabetes. Alternatively, small numbers in the groups may have obscured differences, as Tripathy et al (41) noted 19% lower peripheral insulin sensitivity comparing overweight people with IFG/IGT (n ϭ 29) to those with NGT (n ϭ 216).…”
Section: Combined Ifg and Igtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the regulatory mechanism which controls the glycogen content of muscle is not fully known, the work of Hultman and Nilson (18), Roch-Norlund et al (28,29) and Bergstrom et al (2) emphasises the basic regulatory impor tance of insulin and glucose, the glycogen content being influenced also in a significant way by exercise and diet. With regard to this work, the lower glyco gen values we recorded in obese women could be associated with a lower biologi cal action of insulin in peripheral tissues (6,25), a problem which requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Brook and Llcyd Discussion The work of Davidson (1972) indicates that the adipose tissue of obese subjects may not be insensitive to insulin, and suggests that insensitivity of the muscle mass and/or a circulating insulin antagonist could be more important in the insulin resistance of obesity. The present results likewise do not support the concept that adipose cell size is the most important cause of the hyperinsulinism of obesity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%