2005
DOI: 10.1080/18811248.2005.9726390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Nuclear Fuel Particle Movement on Nuclear Criticality in a Rotating Cylindrical Vessel

Abstract: In conventional criticality safety evaluations of nuclear facilities, nuclear fuel particle behavior could not be considered because any appropriate computational tools did not be developed. A new criticality evaluation tool, which can consider the particle behavior, is developed by coupling a Discrete Element Method with a continuous energy Monte Carlo type code. Criticality evaluations considering the nuclear particle movement in a rotating cylindrical tank are performed by applying this tool. Effects of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inter granular interactions are determined by coefficient of restitution which is 0.25 for UO 2 particulate debris both in particle-particle and particle-wall interactions in dry condition [13]. In a liquid medium, coefficient of restitution comes down further as evidenced from experiments on different materials conducted by Gondret et al [14].…”
Section: Choice Of Simulant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter granular interactions are determined by coefficient of restitution which is 0.25 for UO 2 particulate debris both in particle-particle and particle-wall interactions in dry condition [13]. In a liquid medium, coefficient of restitution comes down further as evidenced from experiments on different materials conducted by Gondret et al [14].…”
Section: Choice Of Simulant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous DEM simulations, the calculation domain, i.e., the wall boundary, was modeled using surface equations (Sakai et al, 2005) or meshes (Shigeto and Sakai, 2011;Mateo-Ortiz et al, 2014). The use of surface equations is an easy approach to create simple regimes.…”
Section: Existing Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, modeling of an arbitrary shaped wall is also important in industrial systems. In previous studies, a combination of simple surface equations (Mio et al, 2002;Liu et al, 2011;Sakai et al, 2005), the location of DEM particles and meshes (Shigeto and Sakai, 2011;Mateo-Ortiz et al, 2014) was used to create a wall boundary in the DEM. The combination of simple surface equations was difficult to create an arbitrarily shaped domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of this drag force modeling was established through correct predictions of pressure drop and minimum fluidization velocity [3,6]. Predictably, the gravitational force is given by:…”
Section: Drag Force and External Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the DEM has been used in many powder processes, e.g. ball mills [6,7], mixers [8,9], grinding processes [10], etc. Furthermore, the DEM easily takes into account the effects of cohesive forces [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%