2004
DOI: 10.1134/1.1808830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of nonradiative recombination centers on photoluminescence efficiency in quantum dot structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By their very nature, nanocrystals have a very high surface‐to‐volume ratio. Regardless of the manufacturing technique, nanocrystal structures contain numerous defects, both within the nanocrystal and at the interface with the matrix material 104. The point defects act as nonradiative recombination sites.…”
Section: Research and Development Needs In The Synthesis And Procementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By their very nature, nanocrystals have a very high surface‐to‐volume ratio. Regardless of the manufacturing technique, nanocrystal structures contain numerous defects, both within the nanocrystal and at the interface with the matrix material 104. The point defects act as nonradiative recombination sites.…”
Section: Research and Development Needs In The Synthesis And Procementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These oversized QDs are typical of InAs QD ensembles, and are known to be a cause of nonradiative recombination, as they are plastically relaxed. 23 Remarkably, these oversized QDs have not been detected in our QD ensembles exposed to moderate Sb pressures ͓Fig. 1͑a͒ compared to Fig.…”
Section: A Ensemble Characterization: Afm Pl and Rheedmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, adopting this unconventional growth regime to incorporate Bi into the host GaAs lattice creates structural defects which behave as nonradiative centers such as native point defects and clusters [25] affecting their optical efficiency. It is well-known that post-growth This is the author's peer reviewed, accepted manuscript.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%