New Trends in Diagnosis and Management of Stroke 1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-72996-6_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Nimodipine on the Cerebral Circulation and Acute Ischemic Stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The therapeutic outcome of a neuroprotectant may depend on the specific subtype of cerebral infarction [24,25]. For example, pooled results from five randomized trials about Nimodipine on acute ischaemic stroke showed that significantly less neurologic impairment was only documented under Nimodipine treatment with moderate-to-severe stroke [26]. In this study, our subgroup analysis showed that in non-lacunar stroke, Ginsenoside-Rd markedly improved the mRs at 3 months but had no obvious effect on short- In both the intention-to-treat population and the per-protocol population, the odds for improvement integrated across all cut points of the scale were increased by ginsenoside-Rd, as compared with placebo (FAS: OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.08-2.78; PPS: OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.12-2.90).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The therapeutic outcome of a neuroprotectant may depend on the specific subtype of cerebral infarction [24,25]. For example, pooled results from five randomized trials about Nimodipine on acute ischaemic stroke showed that significantly less neurologic impairment was only documented under Nimodipine treatment with moderate-to-severe stroke [26]. In this study, our subgroup analysis showed that in non-lacunar stroke, Ginsenoside-Rd markedly improved the mRs at 3 months but had no obvious effect on short- In both the intention-to-treat population and the per-protocol population, the odds for improvement integrated across all cut points of the scale were increased by ginsenoside-Rd, as compared with placebo (FAS: OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.08-2.78; PPS: OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.12-2.90).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%