Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-8146(01)00386-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of natural fermentation on nutritive value and in vitro protein digestibility of pearl millet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
47
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of total phenols (273mg/100g and 306.7 to 669.4mg/100g) are comparable with those of different investigators including Singh et al and Samia et al [19][20]. Other investigators [21][22][23][24] have stated that the different processing method significantly reduced the polyphenol content. Reduction in polyphenol may be attributed to the removal of the outer layer of the grain, which was reported to be rich in polyphenols, possibly attributable to the presence of phenolic oxidase during germination.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The results of total phenols (273mg/100g and 306.7 to 669.4mg/100g) are comparable with those of different investigators including Singh et al and Samia et al [19][20]. Other investigators [21][22][23][24] have stated that the different processing method significantly reduced the polyphenol content. Reduction in polyphenol may be attributed to the removal of the outer layer of the grain, which was reported to be rich in polyphenols, possibly attributable to the presence of phenolic oxidase during germination.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…On the contrary, Igbabul et al (2014) showed a decrease in the ash content of mahogany bean (Afzelia africana) seed flour during fermentation. The value obtained for millet flour was less than the range given by Elyas et al (2002), who reported a range of 1.2-2.1%. As shown in Table 1, the fiber capacity of millet flour, millet kisra batter, millet hulu-mur batter after adding spices and millet hulu-mur batter before adding spices were 1.02, 0.21, 0.24 and 0.28%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Polyphenolics reduction after fermentation follows the sequence suggested by Elyas et al, (2002). Polyphenolics reduction after close controlled fermentation 14.78±1.00, 20.65±0.58 and 17.43±1.16 for PM, FM and Sorghum respectively effected not to that extent as for previous treatments of soaking and germination.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Proximate Composition Of Raw And Procsupporting
confidence: 63%