2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of multiscale reinforcement on the mechanical properties and microstructure of microcrystalline cellulose-carbon nanotube reinforced cementitious composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
29
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The kind of NC is a key factor, as proven by studies carried out by Vazquez et al [87], Hoyos et al [90], Cengiz et al [75], and Alshaghel et al [88]. They used commercial MCC, which has a lower aspect ratio (from 0.04 to 5) and a higher tendency to aggregate in clusters than those of CNF (the aspect ratio can reach values over 100), as showed by SEM images obtained by Alshaghel et al [88], Cengiz et al [75], and Tanpichai [109]. The low aspect ratio of MCC and its aggregate-forming clusters decrease its ability to bond cracks, reducing its reinforcing effect.…”
Section: Nanocelluloses In the Cement And Fiber-cement Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kind of NC is a key factor, as proven by studies carried out by Vazquez et al [87], Hoyos et al [90], Cengiz et al [75], and Alshaghel et al [88]. They used commercial MCC, which has a lower aspect ratio (from 0.04 to 5) and a higher tendency to aggregate in clusters than those of CNF (the aspect ratio can reach values over 100), as showed by SEM images obtained by Alshaghel et al [88], Cengiz et al [75], and Tanpichai [109]. The low aspect ratio of MCC and its aggregate-forming clusters decrease its ability to bond cracks, reducing its reinforcing effect.…”
Section: Nanocelluloses In the Cement And Fiber-cement Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample prepared with 100% TBP exhibited very low surface porosity indicating effective suppression of foam by the defoamer. Previous research on MCC-CNT reinforced cementitious composites also suggested 1:1 as the optimum TBP: CTAB ratio for preparing cementitious composites with low porosity and good mechanical properties (Alshaghel et al 2018). In case of Pluronic F-127 surfactant, a 0.5:1 ratio of TBP: Pluronic was found sufficient in suppressing foam formation and prepare composites with low volume of pores (Alshaghel et al 2018).…”
Section: Quality Of Freshly Prepared Mortar Pastesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…the pre-cracking mechanical behavior) whereas the other reinforcement enhanced the toughness and ductility (i.e. the post-cracking behavior) (Alshaghel et al 2018;Cao et al 2019). For example, a combination of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) with MCC was used to improve both pre and post-cracking mechanical behavior of cementitious composites, in which MCC mainly improved the stiffness and strength, whereas CNTs controlled the post-cracking fracture behavior through crack-bridging (Alshaghel et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e fundamental challenge for applied research on carbon nanotube-reinforced nanocomposites can be illustrated by the electron microscope images shown in Figure 1, where multiwalled carbon nanotubes (decade nanometers in diameter) are deposited on the surface of carbon fibers (a few microns in diameter) in yarn bundles (a few millimeters in diameter) [17,18]. e variation in the characteristic length scale of the reinforcement presents both new challenges and significant advantages in the development of fabrication techniques for carbon nanotube-reinforced nanocomposites [19][20][21][22] and the development of characterization techniques for such nanocomposites [23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%