Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.5958/2395-146x.2020.00002.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of moisture content on vitreous matrix formation of maize kernel in normal, opaque-2 and qpm germplasm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modification score represents the degree of opaqueness, namely, 1 for normal lines (0% opaqueness), 5 (100%) for opaque‐2 , and 2 (25%) for QPM lines (Tandzi et al, 2017). Similarly, the moisture content varied from 12.5% to 26.7% among normal, opaque‐2 , and QPM lines, with the least moisture content in QPM and the maximum moisture content in opaque‐2 (Sethi, Kaur, et al, 2020). Specific gravity, 100 kernel weight, and yield potential were the highest in normal, intermediate in QPM, and the lowest in opaque‐2 lines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The modification score represents the degree of opaqueness, namely, 1 for normal lines (0% opaqueness), 5 (100%) for opaque‐2 , and 2 (25%) for QPM lines (Tandzi et al, 2017). Similarly, the moisture content varied from 12.5% to 26.7% among normal, opaque‐2 , and QPM lines, with the least moisture content in QPM and the maximum moisture content in opaque‐2 (Sethi, Kaur, et al, 2020). Specific gravity, 100 kernel weight, and yield potential were the highest in normal, intermediate in QPM, and the lowest in opaque‐2 lines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physiological traits of normal, opaque‐2 , and QPM lines were studied, and it was reported that normal lines have high yield potential, 100 kernel weight, and specific gravity with 0% opaqueness, whereas the opaque‐2 mutation leads to 100% opaqueness, which distorts the starch protein matrix and subsequently increases the moisture content (Sethi et al, 2020); however, 100 kernel weight and specific gravity decrease in opaque‐2 lines and the opaque‐2 mutation is also known to negatively influence the yield potential. In QPM, introgression of endosperm modifiers leads to retention of the vitreous kernel texture and moisture content decreases, whereas 100 kernel weight, specific gravity, and yield potential are higher than those of opaque‐2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation