2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11012-017-0816-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of micropillar surface texturing on friction under elastic dry reciprocating contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a series of sliding tests, both textured surfaces were seen to trap wear debris and had a lower coefficient of friction than the nominally smooth surfaces. Other investigations on metal textured surfaces and the associated functional response are discussed in [91].…”
Section: Metal Texturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series of sliding tests, both textured surfaces were seen to trap wear debris and had a lower coefficient of friction than the nominally smooth surfaces. Other investigations on metal textured surfaces and the associated functional response are discussed in [91].…”
Section: Metal Texturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micropillars are three-dimensional microstructures characterized by a very large extension in one dimension, resulting in a great aspect ratio. Nowadays, many applications in diverse fields are taking advantage of micropillars such as optics, tribology, biology, and biomedical engineering. Usually, micropillars are fabricated in a cleanroom by subtractive processes such as photolithography in combination with dry and wet etching, wire-electrode cutting, bulk micromachining, and laser cutting. One microfabrication method that is gaining increased popularity is 3D inkjet printing. It is an attractive technique for micropillar production because it allows flexible, room-temperature, scalable, and economical fabrication processes. Among different applications of micropillars in biomedical engineering, perhaps the most relevant are 3D microelectrode arrays (3D MEAs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three-dimensional microelectrode arrays have attracted considerable interest due to their use in various applications for in vivo and in vitro studies, such as cellular recording, biosensors, and drug delivery. This is because three-dimensional structures allow for increased device area, spatial resolution, and signal-to-noise ratio. In the case of cellular recording, conductive micropillars are used as the interface between the device and the cell under investigation to measure action potentials. Regarding biosensors and biomedical implants, the micropillar-based electrodes act as a vital component for monitoring organ activity and electrically/optically/thermally stimulated therapy. In the electrode–tissue interface, the mechanical mismatch between the tissues and the electrode should be minimized to avoid invasive tissue damage and related loss of devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an interface specialization can be pursued, for instance, by micro-structuring the surfaces in micro-pillars and nanofibers with specific aspect ratio, size, and orientation. Recent studies 12 14 have experimentally investigated the effect of the interfacial micropillars geometry on dry friction between both soft and hard contact pairs (namely steel and low-density polyethylene), showing that specific design conditions are able to produce an effective friction reduction. Similarly, experimental measurements have also been performed in smaller structures 15 , 16 , such as polymeric nano hairs and nanofibers opportunely machined via colloidal lithography, aiming at highlighting the effect of the micro-structures aspect ratio on the frictional behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%