2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of mesopore-induced strain/stress on the thermoelectric properties of mesoporous ZnO thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work has focused on a multiscale disorder to reduce the phonon contribution to thermal conductivity while maintaining electrical conductivity . Thin-film thermoelectrics allow great control over disorder using strain, grain boundary control, and local doping techniques. The advantage of thin-film thermoelectrics is that they can handle higher heat fluxes compared to the bulk due to their lower thermal resistance, but a downside is that a lower temperature difference (Δ T ) can be sustained across them. Ultimately, to improve microcooler performance, one must optimize both the material properties and the electrical interfaces with the contacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work has focused on a multiscale disorder to reduce the phonon contribution to thermal conductivity while maintaining electrical conductivity . Thin-film thermoelectrics allow great control over disorder using strain, grain boundary control, and local doping techniques. The advantage of thin-film thermoelectrics is that they can handle higher heat fluxes compared to the bulk due to their lower thermal resistance, but a downside is that a lower temperature difference (Δ T ) can be sustained across them. Ultimately, to improve microcooler performance, one must optimize both the material properties and the electrical interfaces with the contacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(A)Temperature‐dependent PF values of GZO thin films in this work; (B) the highest PF value comparison at higher (left side) and lower (right side) temperatures for GZO thin film in this work and other ZnO‐based thin films from references (AO/ZnO is Al 2 O 3 /ZnO superlattices and ZTO stands for Sn doped ZnO films) 10,29‐32 [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consequently, with excellent electrical conductivity originated from higher carrier concentration and Seebeck coefficient due to large DOS effective mass, GZO-3 nm ZnO-GZO-V thin film presents better power factor values over the entire temperature range with the highest value of 434 μW m −1 K −2 at 623 K, as shown in Figure 7A. Compared with other ZnO-based thin films taken from the references 10,[29][30][31][32] (Figure 7B), the PF value of our GZO-ZnO-GZO-V thin film is still the highest and competitive not only at higher temperatures but also at room temperature. As a result, sandwich structure design combined with defect engineering is an effective approach to realize simultaneous increase of the Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity and thus further improve the thermoelectric performance for ZnO-based thin films.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…56 In the presintering process, the low-temperature increase rate helps to stabilize the films, thereby decreasing the collapse of the ZnO films. 27 However, under UV irradiation, photooxidative degradation directly occurs, which results in breaking of the polymer chains into free radicals and small molecules. 57 Therefore, a more serious collapse and smaller pore sizes are observed in the final UV-irradiated ZnO films.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as far as we know, rare effort has been made to study the influence of different post-treatment techniques on the pore size of the final polymer-free inorganic films. In the literature, the strain changes of mesoporous ZnO structures after organic surfactant decomposition via ultraviolet (UV) irradiation and thermal annealing were compared to accurately calculate the strain change in the ZnO crystallization process . In general, UV irradiation and high-temperature sintering are two commonly used methods for the diblock copolymer removal from polymer–metal oxide composite films prepared via sol–gel synthesis. ,, During UV irradiation or sintering, the polymer template is removed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%