2017
DOI: 10.1002/nag.2721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of meso‐structure on strength and size effect in concrete under tension

Abstract: SummaryThe effect of heterogeneity in meso level geometric and material properties on tensile strength and size effect in split cylinder specimens is investigated. Critical meso geometric parameters are identified by studying their influence on the evolution of the fracture process zone. A statistical analysis is used to account for dependencies between the parameters. A reversal of the size effect, important for the strength of field specimens, is observed for certain meso geometries. Meso level explanations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7.1, [58]). The material heterogeneity slightly augments the size effect [32]. The concrete brittleness also decreased with decreasing specimen diameter.…”
Section: Size Effect: Comparison Of Dem Predictions and Experimental mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…7.1, [58]). The material heterogeneity slightly augments the size effect [32]. The concrete brittleness also decreased with decreasing specimen diameter.…”
Section: Size Effect: Comparison Of Dem Predictions and Experimental mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…DEM was also used to reproduce damage in concrete by other researchers [20][21][22][23][24]. The splitting test for concrete was simulated within continuum mechanics [25][26][27][28][29][30] and discrete mechanics using DEM [31][32][33]. A simplified geometric meso-structure was however assumed in DEM calculations [31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Before conducting the simulations, the range for each parameter used in previous published studies [38,40,45,46,47,48,49] was compiled. Several parameters in the flat joint model were then assigned the most commonly used values (see Table 2).…”
Section: The Discrete Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%