2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of mesh size and codend circumference on selectivity in the Mediterranean demersal trawl fisheries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
41
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with the results of the other studies conducted in the Mediterranean waters (Lök et al, 1997;Özbilgin et al, 2005;Sala et al, 2006;Kaykaç, 2007;Sala and Luchetti, 2010;. The only common species between the present and the other studies (Lök et al, 1997;Sala et al, 2006;Kaykaç, 2007;Sala and Luchetti, 2011) is the red mullet for which all the investigations clearly conclude that the narrow codend has higher L 50 values. However, because of the differences in the mesh material, mesh size, mesh diameter, presence and types of knots, number of meshes around the codend and tunnel, towing duration and populations fished, the results of the present study and the other investigations on the effect of codend circumference on selectivity are not directly comparable in terms of selection parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is consistent with the results of the other studies conducted in the Mediterranean waters (Lök et al, 1997;Özbilgin et al, 2005;Sala et al, 2006;Kaykaç, 2007;Sala and Luchetti, 2010;. The only common species between the present and the other studies (Lök et al, 1997;Sala et al, 2006;Kaykaç, 2007;Sala and Luchetti, 2011) is the red mullet for which all the investigations clearly conclude that the narrow codend has higher L 50 values. However, because of the differences in the mesh material, mesh size, mesh diameter, presence and types of knots, number of meshes around the codend and tunnel, towing duration and populations fished, the results of the present study and the other investigations on the effect of codend circumference on selectivity are not directly comparable in terms of selection parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In general, for the same mesh size, reducing the number of mesh around the codend might improve codend selectivity (Reeves et al, 1992;Broadhurst and Kennelly, 1996;Lök et al, 1997;Broadhurst et al, 2004;Özbilgin et al, 2005;Sala and Luchetti, 2011). Because during the haul, when the codend fills, diamond meshes elongate under tension, the end meshes are blocked, water flow is diverted and the codend forms a typical bulge which expands to a maximum diameter (Robertson and Stewart, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the codend catch size did not have a significant effect on L 50 or SR values of the fish species Merluccius merluccius , Merlangius merlangus, Trisopterus minutuscapelanus, Mullus barbatus and Pagellus erythrinus analysed by Sala et al. () and Sala and Lucchetti (). Sala, Lucchetti, Piccinetti, and Ferretti () report a positive effect of mesh configuration on L 50 , and a small but significant negative influence on catch size and depth on SR for P. longirostris .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Very few empirical data are available describing the effects of SR on penaeid trawls (but see Broadhurst et al 2014b), although it is well established that the SR in benthic-teleost trawls can vary according to a (Sala et al 2008). …”
Section: Optimise Spread Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%