2011
DOI: 10.1080/02664760903563627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of measurement error and autocorrelation on thechart

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
121
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But, in many industrial scenarios, there often exist significant measurement errors that affect the performance of control charts. Since Bennet (1954) investigated the effect of measurement errors on the ShewhartX chart, there are many studies about the actual performance of various control charts in the presence of measurement error, for further details see for instance: Kanazuka (1986), , Linna, Woodall, and Busby (2001), Maravelakis (2004), Costa and Castagliola (2011), Maravelakis (2012). Recently, Hu et al (2015) investigated the performance of the syntheticX chart when measurement errors exist using a linear covariate error model and they showed that the performance of the syntheticX chart is significantly affected in the presence of measurement error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, in many industrial scenarios, there often exist significant measurement errors that affect the performance of control charts. Since Bennet (1954) investigated the effect of measurement errors on the ShewhartX chart, there are many studies about the actual performance of various control charts in the presence of measurement error, for further details see for instance: Kanazuka (1986), , Linna, Woodall, and Busby (2001), Maravelakis (2004), Costa and Castagliola (2011), Maravelakis (2012). Recently, Hu et al (2015) investigated the performance of the syntheticX chart when measurement errors exist using a linear covariate error model and they showed that the performance of the syntheticX chart is significantly affected in the presence of measurement error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding to the correlation, if the de- pendence among X observations and among Y observations are the same (or close), that is, a ∼ = b, T 2 chart has a better overall performance when the variables X and Y are highly correlated. The authors are currently investigating the use of the skip sampling strategy proposed by Costa and Castagliola (2011) and the mixed sampling strategy proposed by Franco et al (2013) to reduce the negative effect of the autocorrelations on the statistical performance of the T 2 control chart. λ 2 (n) = n 3 δ 2 2 (b − 1) 4 (b + 1) b 3 (n 2 ρ 2 − n 2 + 2nρ 2 + ρ 2 ) − b 2 (n 2 ρ 2 − n 2 + 2nρ 2 − 2n) + b 2n+2 ρ 2 − 2b n+3 ρ 2 − 2b n+2 ρ 2 + b 2n+3 ρ 2 − 2b n+1 n + 2b n+2 n + n 2 ρ 2 − n 2 + 2b n+1 nρ 2 − 2b n+3 nρ 2 −1 (B.2)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the negative effect of autocorrelation on the statistical performance of the Shewhart X control chart, Costa and Castagliola (2011) proposed a sampling strategy denoted 's-skip'. According to this strategy, samples are obtained by collecting one item from the production line and then skipping s consecutive items before selecting the next one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, for example, (Haiyu, 2010;Costa and Castagliola, 2011;Tasdemir, 2012;Goswami and Dutta, 2013;Singh and Prajapati, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%