2016
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1198507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The performance of the Shewhart-RZ control chart in the presence of measurement error

Abstract: Recent literature about quality control has investigated the continuous surveillance of the ratio of two normal random variables under the assumption of no measurement error. However, in practice, measurement errors always exist in quality control applications and may considerably affect the performance of control charts. In this paper, the performance of the Shewhart-RZ control chart is investigated in the presence of a measurement error and modelled by a linear covariate error model. Several figures and tabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific value of η = 0.28 is motivated by assuming an acceptable value for the signal‐to‐noise ratio SNR=21+η2111+η2=2η, which is a measure of performance of the precision adequacy of the measurement system; see Montgomery . As discussed in Tran et al, assume η = 0.28 corresponds to S N R = 5, which is the lower bound value to get an acceptable precision of the measurement system.…”
Section: The Effect Of Measurement Errors On the Shewhart‐cv Control mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific value of η = 0.28 is motivated by assuming an acceptable value for the signal‐to‐noise ratio SNR=21+η2111+η2=2η, which is a measure of performance of the precision adequacy of the measurement system; see Montgomery . As discussed in Tran et al, assume η = 0.28 corresponds to S N R = 5, which is the lower bound value to get an acceptable precision of the measurement system.…”
Section: The Effect Of Measurement Errors On the Shewhart‐cv Control mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the c.d.f., the p.d.f., and the i.d.f. of trueZ^i can be deduced from the their counterparts in , and , see Tran et al for more details. In the resulting functions, we replace the index Z by trueZ^i.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of the Distribution Of The Sample Of The Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in many industrial scenarios, there often exist significant measurement errors that affect the performance of control charts. Since Bennet investigated the effect of measurement errors on the Shewhart trueX¯ chart, the consequences of the measurement errors on the performance of various control charts have been studied by a number of authors, see, for example, Kanazuka, Linna and Woodall, Linna et al, Maravelakis, Costa and Castagliola, Maravelakis, Hu et al, Noorossana and Zerehsaz, Hu et al, Tran et al, Tran et al, Cheng and Wang, Maleki et al, Tran, and Tran et al According to Maleki et al, an exact measurement is a rare phenomenon in any manufacturing and service environment that involves human intervention. Consequently, the existence of errors due to either the measurement instruments and/or operators is inevitable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%