2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2012.00350.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of manual dynamic activation on smear layer removal efficacy of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and SmearClear: An in vitro scanning electron microscopic study

Abstract: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of manual dynamic activation (MDA) with a master gutta-percha point on the smear layer removal efficacy of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and SmearClear. Fifty freshly extracted human single-rooted teeth were prepared using ProTaper rotary system up to F3 size. The prepared teeth were divided into five groups on the basis of final irrigation received. Group A: 3% NaOCl solution (negative control group). Group B: 5 mL of 17% EDTA. Group C: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not use EDTA in the current study since it has the potential to remove the smear layer after root canal preparation [32, 33]. Rather than using EDTA, the removal potential of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on smear layer was evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not use EDTA in the current study since it has the potential to remove the smear layer after root canal preparation [32, 33]. Rather than using EDTA, the removal potential of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on smear layer was evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to decrease the amount of smear layer on root canal surfaces, irrigants and antiseptic agents are used, enhancing the effect of hand instrumentation and improving the efficiency of the sodium hypochlorite. However, studies have shown that a combination of NaOCl and EDTA remove the smear layer only partially [12, 32, 33]. In addition to this, Sen et al [34] investigated the antifungal effects of 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) and 1% and 5% NaOCl on C. albicans and concluded that both the smear layer and biofilms of C. albicans delayed or stopped the antifungal capacity of NaOCl and CHX.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of root canal irrigation technologies, different modalities have become available such as conventional needle irrigation (CI), manual-dynamic irrigation (MDI), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and laser-activated irrigation (LAI) [5][6][7]. Andrabi et al [8] found that MDI allowed the irrigant solution to easily reach the apical third of the root through effective hydrodynamic activation. This method can also neutralize the vapor lock effect, thus improving the cleaning efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combination is able to remove the smear layer effectively in the coronal and middle thirds rather than the apical part (3,4). Additionally, citric acid, maleic acid, EDTAC and MTAD were used as an agent for removing smear layer (5,6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%