Effect of Manual Data Cleaning on Nutrient Intakes Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24)

Abstract

Background Automated dietary assessment tools such as ASA24® are useful for collecting 24-hour recall data in large-scale studies. Modifications made during manual data cleaning may affect nutrient intakes. Objectives We evaluated the effects of modifications made during manual data cleaning on nutrients intakes of interest: energy, carbohydrate, total fat, protein, and fiber. Methods Differences in mean intake before and after data cleaning modifications for all recalls and average intakes per subject were analyzed by paired t-tests. Chi-squared test was used to determine whether unsupervised recalls had more open-ended text responses that required modification than supervised recalls. We characterized food types of text response modifications. Correlations between predictive energy requirements, measured total energy expenditure (TEE), and mean energy intake from raw and modified data were examined. Results After excluding 11 recalls with invalidating technical errors, 1499 valid recalls completed by 393 subjects were included in this analysis. We found significant differences before and after modifications for energy, carbohydrate, total fat, and protein intakes for all recalls (p < 0.05). Limiting to modified recalls, there were significant differences for all nutrients of interest, including fiber (p < 0.02). There was not a significantly greater proportion of text responses requiring modification for home compared to supervised recalls (p = 0.271). Predicted energy requirements correlated highly with TEE. There was no significant difference in correlation of mean energy intake with TEE for modified compared to raw data. Mean intake for individual subjects was significantly different for energy, protein, and fat intakes following cleaning modifications (p < 0.001). Conclusions Manual modifications can change mean nutrient intakes for an entire cohort and individuals. However, modifications did not significantly affect correlation of energy intake with predictive requirements and measured expenditure. Investigators can consider their research question and nutrients of interest when deciding to make cleaning modifications.

Diet, Fecal Microbiome, and Trimethylamine N-Oxide in a Cohort of Metabolically Healthy United States Adults

“…The ASA24 recalls were rigorously quality checked by a registered dietitian following National Cancer Institute (NCI) guidelines and only participants with at least two recalls were included [ 23 , 24 ]. The recalls of each participant were averaged to represent average daily food intake.…”

Use of digital food records in clinical settings - lessons in translation from a randomised controlled trial

“…When digital food records are utilised in clinical trial research settings, resource intense management of data including delity of data entry and data cleaning are commonplace to improve data quality (17,46,47). Replicating this time resource in clinical practice is challenging but this study indicates that a dietitian veri cation process may still be necessary in clinical practice to overcome data errors that may impact interpretation of nutrient and food intake assessments for chronic disease management.…”

Association of Diet and Antimicrobial Resistance in Healthy U.S. Adults

“…Recent dietary intake was assessed using the Automated Self-Administered 24-h (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool, versions 2014 and 2016 (70), as described previously (54). The average intake of dietary components was calculated using the average across all at-home 24-h recalls that passed quality control, as we have described previously (71). Habitual diet was estimated using the 2014 Block FFQ (NutritionQuest, Berkeley, CA) and quality checked manually by a registered dietitian as described previously (55).…”