1995
DOI: 10.1097/00001665-199509000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Mandibular Distraction on the Temporomandibular Joint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Condylar resorption, which can result in relapse, is assumed to be less with DO due to gradual stretching of the soft tissues and loading of the condyles. In animal studies, more condylar changes can be seen when the distraction rhythm is increased, probably due to more compressive forces 12,21,31 . Patients with a high mandibular plane angle are probably at risk of relapse after a DO 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condylar resorption, which can result in relapse, is assumed to be less with DO due to gradual stretching of the soft tissues and loading of the condyles. In animal studies, more condylar changes can be seen when the distraction rhythm is increased, probably due to more compressive forces 12,21,31 . Patients with a high mandibular plane angle are probably at risk of relapse after a DO 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is still discussion about the aetiology of PCR occurring after BSSO, reflected by the many influencing factors that have been mentioned in the literature 1,9,30,54,58,75 . Although distraction rates not exceeding 1 mm/day seemed to be within the physiological capacity of the temporomandibular joint, thus causing reversible injury, this has not been proven in human studies 51,52,89,106 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…PCR may occur when certain stresses, in this case due to advancement surgery, are exerted on the articular structures that exceed normal or decreased adaptive capacity 1 . Forces needed to distract the two mandibular fragments during DO might act as a compressive force on distant sites such as the temporomandibular joint 45,52,89 . The loading of the condyles caused by these forces during distraction of 1 mm/day is thought to be gradual, instead of acute, which might prevent or decrease the risk of development of PCR 51,52,83,89,106 , as occasionally observed after BSSO 1,9,30,54,58,75 .…”
Section: Stability and Relapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphology of a deformed TMJ may even be improved as a result of DO treatment 8,15 . After unilateral mandibular DO the cartilaginous alterations are most prominent on the distracted side where the pressure created against the TMJ is greatest 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%